Comments on Do we understand?

Go to ANTINOUVEAUANTIDISESTABLISHMENTARIANISM - Add a comment - Go to Do we understand?

so let me get this straight...
In order to have religious tolerance, we have to ban expression of it on public property?
Wacky

posted by AnCatubh on July 23, 2004 at 2:05 AM | link to this | reply

ThomasFranklin

please don't reach an assumed conclusion about the principles this country was founded on.

We see words like "creator" and such, but no reference to Christ.  A creator is as much a Jewish concept as it is Christian, and I am sure our country had many Jews at that time.  Our country has accepted people of all religions since its inception.

Again, the question arises -- how do you want the country's religious expression to be -- exclusively Christian, at the  exclusion of Jews, and Moslems and Hindus and Buddhists and such?

What do you propose doing about all the other religions?

Now the final question:  do you accept all denominations of Christianity -- Baptist, Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, other Orthodox, Presbyterian, Assemblies of God, Churches of God, African Methodist Episcopal, Lutheran, and the thousands of others? 

Let's add a question:  what brand of Christianity do you ascribe to and do you accept others' brands of Christianity?

posted by Xeno-x on July 21, 2004 at 5:47 PM | link to this | reply

This nation was set up on christian principles-one can not refuse the water well to an untouchable. But, when a state refuses to allow public display of relgious stuff-are they declaring that they are the new god. Who do you follow? I follow my creator who doesn't have a gun.

posted by ThomasFranklin on July 21, 2004 at 10:08 AM | link to this | reply