Go to Should Bush Be Impeached?
- Add a comment
- Go to Now three weeks later, and more, poll after poll demonstrate that bloggers
blogflogger, here's the clue, Homeland Security Bill!
posted by
kingmi
on January 26, 2006 at 4:11 AM
| link to this | reply
Kingmi - No one with half a brain is even implying that the need to ...
...monitor communications between terrorists and contacts in the U.S. is not necessary. Get a clue. What we who value our democracy are saying is that any efforts to monitor communications within the U.S. must fall within our defined established law and our system of checks and balances. The president CANNOT simply decide a specific action is deemed necessary and therefore circumvent our defined system of oversight. He who acts outside of the law without restraint, becomes the law.
posted by
blogflogger
on January 25, 2006 at 10:46 PM
| link to this | reply
Kingmi,
I followed your link and I have to say, is this the same Oliver North who participated in Iran-Contra "Weapons for Drugs" program in Nicaragua in the 80s during the Reagan Administration? I find it hard to take anything he has to say seriously. After all, he only got a set of snow tires out of the deal, he should have held out for more with all the graft and corruption he partook of, but I guess he might have been motivated by more lofty ideals.
posted by
Blanche.
on January 23, 2006 at 8:55 PM
| link to this | reply
Kingmi,
I just got back here and saw the other comments: as an aside, Corbin, you do go on, and on. To Justsouno, we do have a "strong presence in the Middle East", it's called Israel. As for how I know, Bin Laden is laughing, read the transcript of his tape, does he sound scared?
posted by
Blanche.
on January 23, 2006 at 8:43 PM
| link to this | reply
justsouno, I am with you there!
posted by
kingmi
on January 23, 2006 at 8:34 PM
| link to this | reply
Corbin, Let them investigate, and look like the traitors that they are.
posted by
kingmi
on January 23, 2006 at 8:33 PM
| link to this | reply
Blanche, thank you for reading and commenting. All points of view are welc
ome here.
posted by
kingmi
on January 23, 2006 at 8:33 PM
| link to this | reply
Kingmi I saw that spot. This is an excellent post. I don't
know where Blanch gets the information that we could have had OBL. I don't know how she knows when he laughs at this or that. I do know those are not the points of this post.
I have no fear that we will have ML declared. I can not believe anyone would not believe we are safer than we would be if we were not a strong presence in Middle East.
posted by
Justi
on January 23, 2006 at 5:36 PM
| link to this | reply
Now Blanche.....
listen to what you are saying.......
kimgmi....don't tell them...they may realize what fools the appear to be........
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on January 23, 2006 at 5:24 PM
| link to this | reply
Kingmi,
I don't think that President Bush was being gracious in allowing an investigation. We have a constitution which limits Presidential power, and for good reason. Now, my worst fear is that he will declare actual martial law and we will have goose-stepping Homeland Security officers marching down the main streets.
We are not safer than we were 5 years ago. Mr. Bush has had his time to seek out and capture Osama Bin Laden, and Bin Laden is laughing in his face, producing audiotapes still. I say, it is more than time the next election brings us a change of leadership.
posted by
Blanche.
on January 23, 2006 at 12:50 PM
| link to this | reply