Comments on Which Is More Important for Our Children, Reading Strategies or Vocabulary?

Go to Restricted ThreadAdd a commentGo to Which Is More Important for Our Children, Reading Strategies or Vocabulary?

Re: Way to go Ichiro! I've been a fan ever since he came to the Mariners

Pat, Ichiro is so cool.  He's batting ninth for the Yankees, working his way up to cleanup.  Lol

posted by dsm_tchr on October 9, 2012 at 6:15 PM | link to this | reply

Re:

TAPS, sports and music in childhood definitely promote learning -- and fun!

posted by dsm_tchr on October 9, 2012 at 6:14 PM | link to this | reply

Re:

fsi, I find myself teaching vocabulary by talking, showing pictures, dictating, questioning, giving examplws, any way I can.  Lol

posted by dsm_tchr on October 9, 2012 at 6:00 PM | link to this | reply

Re:

lionreign, and yet there are those in every classroom who cannot grasp wide meanings of words and families of words, until too late.  Thanks for the stopover.

posted by dsm_tchr on October 9, 2012 at 5:59 PM | link to this | reply

Vocabulary is definitely an important element.

posted by FormerStudentIntern on October 9, 2012 at 11:42 AM | link to this | reply

HAHA.  Great post.  I definitely got it all.  I grew up with a dad and a brother who were baseball fans in the good old days way back when Kansas City had the KC A's and Zena played the organ like mad every time something good happened.  What spirit we all had.  And when we couldn't go to the stadium over on Brooklyn Avenue, it was almost as good listening to it on the radio.  It was like knowing baseball language.

posted by TAPS. on October 9, 2012 at 8:50 AM | link to this | reply

Way to go Ichiro! I've been a fan ever since he came to the Mariners

years ago.  As for the reading strategies vs vocab -- when I was in grade school we used workbooks titled "We learn by doing." There were the Dick and Jane things, too. (Yes, I'm older than dirt.) We read assignments, we read aloud in class, we learned through repetition, by talking about what we read, and by teacher's explanation. This was before the 'new math' or the idea of reading strategies.

I think there's a lot to be said for an individual's curiosity, following an information thread, getting the satisfaction of discovery. My teachers were pretty good about planting ideas for us to follow up. Don't know if that's a strategy, or just smart teaching.

posted by Pat_B on October 9, 2012 at 7:50 AM | link to this | reply

I agree with lionreign.  Having a large vocubulary helps to open up the mind to more diverse concepts.  It seems this would enable learning more than focus on strategies.

posted by calia14 on October 9, 2012 at 5:47 AM | link to this | reply

As a kid I had a huge vocabulary (gained by reading) and so was able to get on well with literature and learn easily from it.  I don't think I ever felt the need to be told how to understand things, it was something I built up along the way.  To be the vocabulary seems more important.

posted by lionreign on October 9, 2012 at 2:55 AM | link to this | reply

Re: justi, we held off for four months while ESL newcomers learned vocab

posted by dsm_tchr on October 9, 2012 at 1:07 AM | link to this | reply

annicita, the excellent teaders simply did not follow baseball

posted by dsm_tchr on October 9, 2012 at 1:05 AM | link to this | reply

well you didn't clarify ... so we assume that the excellent readers were those who were learning by metacognitive.....

vocabulary is everything...otherwise you might be speaking like the bowery boys and that's quite a misconbobulation!

posted by Annicita on October 8, 2012 at 10:30 PM | link to this | reply

I agree with you.

posted by Against4WindsOn2Flam on October 8, 2012 at 9:26 PM | link to this | reply

I agree vocabulary is so important, how does one comprehend unless they understand verbally?

posted by Justi on October 8, 2012 at 8:19 PM | link to this | reply