Comments on Obama Regime Lied About Knowing Of And Backing Release of Lockerbie Bomber

Go to Keeping America Great 4 More Years!Add a commentGo to Obama Regime Lied About Knowing Of And Backing Release of Lockerbie Bomber

Schlussel may claim to be a conservative.......
but her reputation among conservative circles is that she is a nut job. A conservative progs love to praise........she also has a reputation of going after anyone who disagrees with her to the level of threatening  lawsuits of people who would dare to disagree in her comment section.  

Among her  more notable accomplishments is is accusing Jewish Conservative commentators Mark Levin and Michael Medved of being antisemitic.......

If you hang out in Debbie's world, the good news is that the nuts are free, but the bad news is that the paranoia level is cranked all the way up to X-Files level.

Thank you for your interest, though.......

posted by Corbin_Dallas on July 29, 2010 at 7:10 AM | link to this | reply

Straight talk from an anti-Obama conservative: Bush is to blame for release

July 27, 2010, - 3:58 pm

Bush (NOT Obama) Made Deal on Libya, Megrahi Release; Obama Strongly Opposed
By Debbie Schlussel

I warned people on Sunday that this was a lie. I told them this was a Bush deal all the way. And they attacked me for it because they were asleep during the Bush Administration. But let’s be intellectually honest about who is really responsible for the release of Libyan terrorist Abdel Baset Ali Megrahi. It was President Bush who began restoring relations with Libya, after making a deal with Libyan dictator Muammar Qadaffi, who agreed to inspections over nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction. And, as I noted on this site, a few years ago, several oil companies, including BP, formed a lobbying organization, the U.S.-Libya Business Association–to restore full and complete ties with Libya. President Bush–not Obama–acquiesced to their demands, the first time the US has had full ties with this nutty Islamo-state since 1979. The deal was made in exchange for paying off the families of the victims of Pan Am 103, each of them getting $10 million.

But Qadaffi was slow in making the payments. And ultimately Bush and his friend and special envoy, Tony Blair, worked out a deal. Part of that deal was ultimately the release of Megrahi, and Bush paved the way for this. He dealt with BP and the others and made the deal at their urging. And, since Blair was also Bush’s special Envoy for Squeezing Israel, that was part of the deal, too. Israel gets squeezed, Megrahi gets released, families of Pan Am 103 become mega-millionaires, and BP gets to do bid’ness with Libya. Cheers, everyone. It happened during Obama’s reign, but it was a done deal, too late to stop. And you can thank George W. Period.

But The Australian newspaper story, over the weekend, alleging that the Obama administration urged Megrahi’s release to Libya on humanitarian grounds in a letter, was seized upon by many prominent conservatives. And many conservative readers–who’ve never made a peep, unlike me, about Bush’s deal with Qadaffi–were suddenly blaming Obama with zero proof.  And it turns out it’s a false story.  Obama opposed the release all along.

Yesterday, the Obama administration released the letter in question. And, in fact, it says exactly the opposite of what the reports claim.

So will anyone attack Bush and Blair for the release of Megrahi, as they did to Obama yesterday and over the weekend?  And where is the blaring red capital letter Drudge headline on that?

Good luck with that. Like I said, I believe in intellectual honesty. But it’s in short supply, as much on the right as on the left.  And it’s intellectually dishonest to blame Obama for the Islamo-pandering of Bush. It’s also intellectually dishonest to scream about the Islamo-pandering deeds of Obama that you silently acquiesced to under Bush.

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/25157/bush-not-obama-made-deal-on-libya-megrahi-release-obama-strongly-opposed/

posted by Katray2 on July 29, 2010 at 6:27 AM | link to this | reply

X-man was there a prize?   What does either comment actually have to do with the post?

posted by Corbin_Dallas on July 28, 2010 at 2:04 PM | link to this | reply

Re: WHO MADE THIS STATEMENT? GOD OR HUMAN BEINGS?
"Vengeance is mine", says the Lord, "I will repay"  -- this is from Isaiah and shows the non-vengeful nature of the Judaeo-Christian tradition.  If some atheist or politician tries to incite Jews or Christians against someone who is persecuting them, they need only recall this scripture to realize that revenge is something God handles, if anyone.

posted by cpklapper on July 28, 2010 at 12:57 PM | link to this | reply

X-man......thank you for you clear, concise.......
on topic comment.......Bwwwaaaaahahahahah!  Check your meds buddy.

posted by Corbin_Dallas on July 27, 2010 at 6:10 AM | link to this | reply

WHO MADE THIS STATEMENT? GOD OR HUMAN BEINGS?

VENGEANCE IS MINE -- I WILL REPAY

This is a prime example of the vengefulness of Christians

posted by Xeno-x on July 27, 2010 at 5:52 AM | link to this | reply