Comments on CREATIONISM: SATAN'S TOOL -- ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Go to God as The Universe as an Organism - Add a comment - Go to CREATIONISM: SATAN'S TOOL -- ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Again you are correct . . .

I fail to understand the unintelligent who do not believe such, but, if they were intelligent, they would know, eh? 

posted by archiew on April 6, 2008 at 6:51 AM | link to this | reply

Re: Soul_Builder101

animals DO make reasoned choices.  That has been observed. 

posted by Xeno-x on March 23, 2008 at 9:10 AM | link to this | reply

I really enjoyed reading your post

I don't need to give you a big paragraph on what I think of what you said. I just need to tell you that I enjoyed reading your post - you write on great soul - Encore, Encore. Sometimes I just want to tell Soul_Builder to shut up.

posted by Rhisiart_Inside_Out on March 22, 2008 at 10:56 AM | link to this | reply

Xeno-x - It seems that your experience in attempting to discuss this topic

has been much the same as mine has been here on Blogit.

That being; of the few comments received on the topic, those able to actually define what they are attempting to refute seem few and far between. Quite often the attempts to refute echo the same old nonsensical religiously contrived drivel. Instead of viewing Darwin's "missing link" as the extremely impressive hypothesis that it was in it's historical context, it is instead emphasized as a failing point of a clearly demonstrable theory. In reality the missing link may have never existed but so far, common ancestry with chimpanzees is by far the best explanation we have. More HERE 

The arguments always seem to fall into 3 basic categories; 1. Failing points of the theory are emphasized such as the missing link, or an erroneous belief that there are no transitional fossils. More HERE.  or 2. They introduce aspects not even proposed by the scientific theory of evolution or 3. Evolution always seems to be depicted as "anti faith" when there is really no basis for this attitude. Where evolution proposes the mechanism for how living things change over extended periods of time, there is no reason why this premise of thought cannot be reconciled with the propagating influence of a creator being. Other than an ancient religious chronicle written by men without our present day knowledge.

posted by gomedome on March 20, 2008 at 8:53 AM | link to this | reply

Good/ evil explanations may not do much for 'progress' but it sure explains the duality of behaviour among humans, who unlike animals, are capable of making reasoned choices. Predatory animals do not represent the majority of that kingdom. Evolution is not demonstrable! It is all guesswork made acceptable by the Zionists! See the Protocols of Zion for that admission! Similarly Freud was given success! This global plot for One World Government is 2000 years old and spans all aspects of existence. Why do we have final versions of living things and no examples of eg. half fish, half animal! The half ape/half man example is never to be found! Writing God off the books is more like personal admission of failure to detect him. Faulty holy books fault the presbyters not God! 

posted by Soul_Builder101 on March 19, 2008 at 11:15 AM | link to this | reply