Go to sarooster on politics
- Add a comment
- Go to TMCS and Fact
I looked at this site Xeno-X and I almost fell out of my chair....
Mother Jones. Where in the site specifically are the lies though? There are plenty of timelines, but you have to show me where there are lies in there. And there can't possibly be lies are you would be able to show me the proceedings that confirmed the lies the left talks about. I don't want opinion! I want facts. There is one big fact about going to war. I call it "The Resolution". I blogged about it. Now, that's not opinion, it's fact. No one can show me where the proof is about the lies the President told. And by the way, when is lying by the President wrong. Bill Clinton did more than his share! Lying is not a crime when commited by the President to start off with. I hate the liberals. All they give is opinion. I need facts.
posted by
sarooster
on January 30, 2007 at 4:45 PM
| link to this | reply
i have proof that Bush lied
it's in my THE ILLEGITIMATE ADMINISTRATION -- WHICH HAS THIS LINK
Lie By Lie: Chronicle of a War Foretold
you want to prove that cons are more logical than liberals -- here's your chance
show that this article is flawed.
posted by
Xeno-x
on January 30, 2007 at 2:40 PM
| link to this | reply
corbin
your description fits most cons here to a tee -- particularly various religious cons.
and thank you very much though for setting me up as an example -- i am very flattered
but Rush Limbaugh and common sense? -- excuse me while I 
or is it
Rush makes hay out of vitriol -- his statements are empty air that can easily be discounted, debated and disagreed with --
posted by
Xeno-x
on January 30, 2007 at 2:35 PM
| link to this | reply
They can't show you any facts....that's why they hang in packs on their websites and agree with one another 24/7......and it the same discussions they have had since 2000. They are stuck in a reality loop.......as to common sense.....check out Xeno's post....that proves your point!
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on January 29, 2007 at 5:45 AM
| link to this | reply