Comments on News by CNN: How to Shoot a GI

Go to Naut's ViewAdd a commentGo to News by CNN: How to Shoot a GI

Nautikos
I just dropped by to say thinks for the read.

posted by Justi on November 2, 2006 at 5:38 PM | link to this | reply

Justi,
I agree. I think Lynne Cheney handled herself extremely well!

posted by Nautikos on October 30, 2006 at 6:21 PM | link to this | reply

Nautikos
I saw that. He was truly out classed, out witted as well as out dignified. He was rude and crude because he had invited her to interview her about her book and he wanted to tie her in knots about other writings. I did not like his manner.

posted by Justi on October 30, 2006 at 5:52 PM | link to this | reply

Corbin,
thanks for dropping in! Beyond what I have already said, I won't bother adding more on my view of saads...

posted by Nautikos on October 30, 2006 at 2:07 PM | link to this | reply

BrightIrish
their lack of sensitivity disgusts me!

posted by Nautikos on October 30, 2006 at 2:04 PM | link to this | reply

LeRoy
Really? Thanks for informing us, I wasn't aware of that...

posted by Nautikos on October 30, 2006 at 2:03 PM | link to this | reply

Naut
The thing that irks me is the mass media has a black-out (there I go again--why does it always have to be about color?) on using any footage the U.S. military gives them during briefings because it may be doctored for pro-U.S. purposes.

posted by LeRoyCoyote on October 30, 2006 at 1:14 PM | link to this | reply

Americans refuse to let anyone inside their illegal detention center in Guantanamo Bay Cuba,

Saads....I challange you to prove this obvious lie! 

You are so ate up with hatred......it almost makes one want to pity you.......but we've learned from past events that that would be a very unwise thing to do when dealing with the likes of you........

posted by Corbin_Dallas on October 30, 2006 at 5:02 AM | link to this | reply

Nautikos
Hi .. Sadly while seeking ratings the media seem to disregard the human emotion that is taking place within the film. Where is the compassion for the family and loved ones waiting for their sons,husbands, wives, fathers and mothers to return to them. I am in full agreement with you.

posted by BrightIrish on October 29, 2006 at 10:04 PM | link to this | reply

Blanche.
of course we agree on that. Although that wasn't the issue...

posted by Nautikos on October 29, 2006 at 12:42 PM | link to this | reply

ariel,
thank you!

posted by Nautikos on October 29, 2006 at 12:40 PM | link to this | reply

parnell,

thanks for your comment! Of course there are more important issues, I agree with that. But if we could only talk about the most important issues (always assuming that we could come to an agreement what these are), there wouldn't be much talk in the world, let alone on Blogit.

Besides, I do think discussing the issue of responsible journalism is of some little importance...

posted by Nautikos on October 29, 2006 at 12:39 PM | link to this | reply

saads
there isn't much I can add to what ariel has already expressed so well. Just an observation and a question: aside from being full of hate, your thinking is also very confused! Are you on medication of some kind? Of course, you don't have to tell us...

posted by Nautikos on October 29, 2006 at 12:28 PM | link to this | reply

Tanga,
I can't even begin to imagine what those parents must have felt! And not only those, but the others who have lost loved ones in that war...

posted by Nautikos on October 29, 2006 at 12:21 PM | link to this | reply

saul,

it is of course impossible to remove the 'subjective' element from the reporting of any event. That's why responsible journalists strive for balance by presenting different points of view.  

In this case, if CNN had merely reported the terrorists were making videos of their sniper attacks, that might have been a legitimate item for the news, although not particularly interesting.

But to actually show this terrorist production is unconscionable, no matter what one thinks of the war in Iraq...

posted by Nautikos on October 29, 2006 at 12:18 PM | link to this | reply

Naut, war is hell, I agree.

posted by Blanche. on October 29, 2006 at 12:06 PM | link to this | reply

Wiley,
thanks! I guess you dad understood a few things, and probably more than a few, things that some others clearly do not understand...

posted by Nautikos on October 29, 2006 at 12:03 PM | link to this | reply

Nautikos, This is a well written post.   Your article and the comments to it bring home to us the polarization of the opinions of our people here on Blogit on a small scale and the world in general on a large scale.   You are right.  There is no news until it is made to be news by someone who decides to make it so.

posted by TAPS. on October 29, 2006 at 8:20 AM | link to this | reply

saads

 

Your fatuous and racist view of America and Israel as being the fount of all the evil in the world verge on the insane.

To read your " Muslim-as-victim " views one could be forgiven for thinking that Muslims are pacific propagators of respect, love and tolerance for all other people. Of course, most Muslims only want to live and to prosper among the infidels, but very, very  many of them don't.

They share your disgustingly racist views, and like you, the propagate hatred and intolerance. You can only see the real or perceived wrongdoing of infidels, while completely ignoring the murderous propensites of millions of your co-religionists.

Infidels do not strap bombs about themselves, in order to shred the bodies of innocent women and children ; including their own fellow Muslims. That this is done in the name of religion is the most disgusting lie of all ; it's all about power. It's all about imposing a worldwide, merciless Caliphate on us all.

Isrealis, and other infidels agonise about what their governments do in their name ; damnit all, some are still apologising for the Crusades ( when your lot were as murderous as ours lot )

Do Muslims return the compliment? Do they hell! They either keep their mouths firmly closed about what other Muslims do, or they rejoice in the indiscriminate slaughter of the innocents.

They do this because their mediaeval religion, Islam, is inacapable of reform, and bringing its adherents into the twenty first century.

We Christians and agnostics have evolved, but you haven't. However develped economically you are, culturally you exist in a state of irremediable twelfth century barbarism.

Stil, you can always dismiss this comment as the ignorant rantings of a " psuedo intellectual " as you did last time. Which is a good measure of your intellectual abilities ; don't discuss, just condemn. 

posted by ariel70 on October 29, 2006 at 3:33 AM | link to this | reply

Good post and comments

Saads is not being very tactful tonight, but I understand his point nevertheless. It's a waste of time to worry about crass jourmalism. Americans should be marching in the streets - demanding an end to the genocide that their government and soldiers are commiting in Iraq.

That's the real issue.

posted by Antipodean on October 29, 2006 at 3:32 AM | link to this | reply

Well well well

I hear another American making a hue and cry over what's going on with the 'INNOCENT' American soldiers in Iraq..

Americans refuse to let anyone inside their illegal detention center in Guantanamo Bay Cuba, They kidnap and kill people they deem suspects (without any proof) as you must know a scandal broke out about CIA kidnapping people globally and keeping them in third-country detenion centers, they tap the phone calls of their own people illegally and committ war crimes against civilians including Abu Gharib and the most recent rape-cum-maruder of a whole Iraqi family...

Now what else do you expect from them.. You honestly think they'll be presenting flowers to the U.S. soldiers? There are a couple of old sayings i remember that fit what's going on with U.S. soldiers in Iraq..

1) You play with fire, you get hurt, &

2) As you sow, so shall you reap.

posted by saads on October 29, 2006 at 3:11 AM | link to this | reply

Sad
 I also feel for the family and loved ones who had to witness this.

posted by Tanga on October 29, 2006 at 1:02 AM | link to this | reply

My father has a healthy aversion to news, paper and television. He says
that they're all a bunch of liars.  The one truism in all this is that any story, once reported, is no longer a set of facts, but a set of facts subjectively reported.

posted by saul_relative on October 28, 2006 at 9:58 PM | link to this | reply

Nautikos

You actually wrote me into remembering my father. 

His take on newspapers and jouralists of every stripe was, they need to be reined in and called to task.

I can't imagine anything more horrible to watch than our own men being executed on TV.

Wolf Blitzer ought to be axed for not having the balls to just not report it.

posted by WileyJohn on October 28, 2006 at 7:27 PM | link to this | reply

Blanche.

I am not blaming "the media for not reporting what doesn't exist". I was making the very general statement that the media are selective in chosing the events they report on, anywhere, anytime. In fact, at that moment I wasn't addressing myself to the situation in Iraq at all.

Instead, after having made that very general point, I dealt  with a specific, narrowly defined case: the showing on CNN of a terrorist training/morale-boosting/propaganda tool, and Blitzer's position that it had to be shown because it was 'news'. I simply tried to demonstrate that it was not 'news', did not have to be shown, and should not have been shown. And to maintain that it had to be shown because it is 'news' is based on CNN's faulty reasoning and/or its own agenda.

And I do not doubt for a moment that the situation in Iraq is bad...

posted by Nautikos on October 28, 2006 at 6:57 PM | link to this | reply

blackcat
thanks. I can't say I blame you for not watching the news!

posted by Nautikos on October 28, 2006 at 6:32 PM | link to this | reply

OFFBEATS,
thanks! I think it was insensitive and disrespectful in the extreme to air those tapes...

posted by Nautikos on October 28, 2006 at 6:31 PM | link to this | reply

There is no good news in Iraq, Nautikos, the whole situation is an SNAFU.
So, to blame the media for not reporting what doesn't exist is fallacious reasoning. Ask Scoop if you don't believe me, and as an ex-Marine, he may have more credibiity, than either of us two armchair military strategists.

posted by Blanche. on October 28, 2006 at 5:56 PM | link to this | reply

No one wants to hear good news... so they report the sensationalized

stories to get viewers. 

I rarely intentionall watch the news.  The world is depressing enough without having these images reinforced in our heads.  Unfortunately, these channels are on all day at my office.  We have televisions all over the place with headline news and market commentaries... so it's really hard to miss. 

posted by -blackcat on October 28, 2006 at 4:59 PM | link to this | reply

Naut
I doubt they gave one thought to the Mothers or any other family member. Remember who owns CNN...the mouth from the south, Ted Turner so are you surprised they report such non news? I never ever watch CNN..No need for it in my living room. Whatever possessed them to run that clip is beyond human and must be a desperate ploy for ratings. I just hope it did not work...God Bless..

posted by Offy on October 28, 2006 at 4:53 PM | link to this | reply