Comments on The Terrible Importance Of The Death Of Cory Lidle

Go to The Fine Art Of Subjective Fence BuildingAdd a commentGo to The Terrible Importance Of The Death Of Cory Lidle

Right you are, Azur. As I stated to blackcat, we had to finally wake up in
the real world -- the one where terrorism is a recurring event.  As for you link, I'll be right over, my friend...

posted by saul_relative on October 12, 2006 at 8:43 PM | link to this | reply

The equally worrying thing I believe is that people still believe
that someone else can protect them 100 %. With that expectation there will always be fear. That is not to say that measures should not be in place but people also need to learn to live in the knowledge that everything bad or evil can't be prevented. I realize that this is an unpopular view.

Can I recommend to you the link I left on my post today?


posted by Azur on October 12, 2006 at 8:32 PM | link to this | reply

When the Secretary of Homeland Security makes a public statement that
mass transportation isn't as high a priority as aviation security because only about thirty (his actual number stated) deaths would be involved, we are faced with the knowledge that 1) he has no idea what the hell he's talking about when assessing a realistic death toll, and 2) his low prioritization of mass transportation puts it as an even greater potential target for terrorists.  But, then, given the low prioritization Congress has given Homeland Security (albeit with plenty of lip service), Chertoff's offhand remark shouldn't come as a surprise.  Which means, unfortunately, MysticGmeKeeper, that we are all expendable apparently.

posted by saul_relative on October 12, 2006 at 8:20 PM | link to this | reply

We finally woke up in the real world, blackcat. Suddenly, shockingly,
sadly.

posted by saul_relative on October 12, 2006 at 8:08 PM | link to this | reply

Exactly, afzal. In this instance, we have a social psyche reacting to an
incident that reminds them of a terrible past tragedy.

posted by saul_relative on October 12, 2006 at 8:07 PM | link to this | reply

They say there was a low-lying cloud the occluded the pilots' visibility,
smartdog.

posted by saul_relative on October 12, 2006 at 8:06 PM | link to this | reply

saul
..not their priority. Don't we realize yet that a certain number of us are definately despensible....human attrition I guess

posted by MysticGmekeepr on October 12, 2006 at 12:51 PM | link to this | reply

so strange...

The reason that everyone originally thought the first 9/11 plane was nothing but a small airplane accident is because it's happened before.  This time we had the opposite reaction.  What appeared to be a small plane accident was immediately feared to be the worst. 

Just shows how attitudes have changed.

posted by -blackcat on October 12, 2006 at 11:26 AM | link to this | reply

The real security comes from within your mind .when your psyche is
disturbed a rubber scrap could look like a snake and scare anyone .

posted by afzal50 on October 12, 2006 at 11:18 AM | link to this | reply

Saul
Personally, it disturbs me that this plane even go so close to Manhattan in the first place.  Was visibility that bad?  Was there no call for help by him?

-smartdog


posted by smartdog_670 on October 12, 2006 at 11:03 AM | link to this | reply