Comments on Revisionist First Amendment

Go to Archie's Look at the NewsAdd a commentGo to Revisionist First Amendment

Excellent Comment, Bunny!

Thanks for the excellent contribution to the comments!

 

Archie

posted by archiew on August 31, 2003 at 6:19 AM | link to this | reply

Hey, it's better than the one we have now, which goes:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of any kind of Christian religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, nor shall any government official nor any employee of the government, nor any one person or organization funded by public funds be allowed to use or make seen any non-Christian religious icons, use non-Christian religious speech -- except in the case of Approved Rabbis participating in government-sponsored "interfaith" prayer meetings -- or even look as if they are having religious thoughts that don't involve Jesus, or abridging the freedom of speech, unless it concerns non-monotheistic religions, as above or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, except for the purposes of discussing non-Christian religious topics or worshipping any satanic "pagan" or "new age" "gods" they may recognize and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, except in cases revolving about religion or religious beliefs, in which case all rights and freedoms shall be somewhat restricted for Jews, and more restricted for Muslims, and especially restricted for Non-Christians Whose Religions We Have Heard Of, and severely restricted for all the other blasphemers, and don't get us started on those atheists we pray in Jesus' name amen.

What? You mean that's NOT our First Amendment?

posted by Bunny on August 30, 2003 at 11:13 PM | link to this | reply