Comments on THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE HAS BEEN SAVED IN TEXAS!

Go to Common Sense - Dead or Alive?Add a commentGo to THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE HAS BEEN SAVED IN TEXAS!

Bravo. Excellent post.  I was upset that I was travelling on election day and was not in my precinct so I didn't get to vote.  Not that it would have made any difference.  I too know gay couples who have been together longer than most straight couples I know.  What/who the hell is it hurting if they get married??   We wouldn't want to mess with an 18-year-old's right to get married just because she got knocked up by the guy she has been dating for a month.  Now there's happiness waiting to happen. Ggrr...

posted by Holy_Grail on December 2, 2005 at 6:36 AM | link to this | reply

TX

Ah, so I guess this means you and I have no future together what so ever???

posted by Offy on November 26, 2005 at 3:42 PM | link to this | reply

I love being married
but I am not at all judgemental about those who choose not to. The important thing isn't interpretation of Bible stories, it is being frightened of difference. Those who are most frightened make the most noise and why? Because noise drowns out the similarities and the empathy that such people really feel. That is what they're afraid of and we shouldn't be led to believe otherwise.

posted by malcolm on November 18, 2005 at 3:17 PM | link to this | reply

TXSwimmer
I share some of your views and ideas...unfortunately...it is too "easy" to break a marriage bond. I do have many gay friends who share homes and children with their "partner" and I don't see anything wrong with that. In fact, it gives them a better name...knowing they are seriously dedicated and want what everybody wants...someone to share their lives with. Great information!

posted by cosy on November 14, 2005 at 12:29 PM | link to this | reply

The end of the post........

For those who were disappointed by the end of this tome, let me just say this.  The end of this blog is pure hyperbole.  It is, in essence, a logical, though radical conclusion to the arguments propounded by the so-called saviors of the sanctity of marriage.

One cannot logically argue that banning gay marriage preserves the sanctity of marriage.  Preferring one form of marriage over another is one thing, but since the sanctity of marriage in the United States had largely been destroyed prior to the debate over gay marriage, the argument is fallacious and without merit.

I am glad I raised a few hackles.

I DO believe in the sanctity of marriage.  I believe that most problems should be worked through.  I believe in monogamy.  Unfortunately, divorce IS a last resort solution to a failing marriage, but it should be the last act, and avoided at all costs.

I would love to see the divorce laws mad tougher.  I would really love to see prople who get a marriage license get it only after they have had courses in marriage (yes, they can be secular, yet value filled).  I believe, moreover, that no one should have children without a license.  The ability to breed doesn't give you an unfettered right to do so.

BTW - GAY people do have children - it's called artificial insemination for lesbians, and surrogate mother hood for gay men (although many gay men, who are not bisexual in orientation, be able to perform the act, opt for the natural way as opposed to artificial insemination).

Thanks for your read and your comments.

 

 

 

posted by TXSwimmer on November 14, 2005 at 12:11 PM | link to this | reply

good post

posted by Xeno-x on November 14, 2005 at 8:59 AM | link to this | reply

I was disappointed by the end of your post too.
But the thoughts are good. I was just hearing a hearing a story last night about (yet another) woman who was left by her husband who decided to be true to himself and be with another man. Tell me how this sanctity of marriage deal helps her...

posted by FactorFiction on November 11, 2005 at 10:21 AM | link to this | reply

Gay people are not having kids- Bi-sexuals are having kids

posted by dryten on November 10, 2005 at 8:27 PM | link to this | reply

TXSwimmer
What a horrid ending to a really good post....and I have a great sense of humor....having graduated long ago from Hereford High School, I've just always been extra sensitive to any pasture associations and find your thinking about milk a bunch of bull. 

posted by Krisles on November 10, 2005 at 12:56 PM | link to this | reply

I believe in marriage
but I don't believe in man's conviction that he can turn it into a prison, either from within or without.

posted by malcolm on November 9, 2005 at 11:28 AM | link to this | reply

I think gay people deserve to be just as miserable as the rest of us. lol

posted by Renigade on November 9, 2005 at 9:27 AM | link to this | reply

Swimmer...good points brought up. Yep, let straight people crap all over
the santity of marrige, but ban the homosexuals.  What a facked up world we live in.  I support gay marriage 100%.  It's pretty pathetic that murders, killers, criminials, baby rapers, etc. have more CIVIL rights than people who simply have a different sexual preference. 

posted by Masky on November 9, 2005 at 9:13 AM | link to this | reply

Good Blog.
I think that there is too much of an "apparatus" of law around marriage to abolish it though .  It would leave a big gap that would terrify people!

posted by Trevor_Cunnington on November 9, 2005 at 8:40 AM | link to this | reply

TXSwimmer
I couldn't care less who an absolute stranger marries, male or female, straight or gay. Who falls in love with whom simply isn't my business. For the life of me, I can't understand why some believe it's theirs.    

posted by Talion on November 9, 2005 at 7:10 AM | link to this | reply