Go to If I get smart with you....how will you know?
- Add a comment
- Go to Comments from those that supported WMD intelligence information....
Xeno-x
And there are also tons of information stating the opposite.....go figure.......
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on November 4, 2005 at 6:28 AM
| link to this | reply
no opinion
it is facts
there are tons of information that show that this indeed was the case.
posted by
Xeno-x
on November 4, 2005 at 6:19 AM
| link to this | reply
Scoop
Don't get discouraged.......you live in the greatest country in the world. All of this stuff is just fluff........
I saw you talking about your granddaughter. What a blessing you have there. Rent her favorite movie and watch it with her. Take her out for a walk and look around at all of the miracles God has provided for our enjoyment...they'd mean a lot more if we'd just take the time to touch them.
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on November 4, 2005 at 4:17 AM
| link to this | reply
Corbin I guess it is, I don't care anymore
posted by
scoop
on November 3, 2005 at 5:22 PM
| link to this | reply
scoop
No offense.....but is that the best you can come up with?
The point here is that everyone felt the information was good enough. The British intellegence still stands by their information and it now comes out that the story told by Wilson in his public, I've written a book, mask was a bit different from the info he gave the committee....
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on November 3, 2005 at 5:06 PM
| link to this | reply
Yes but there is a difference
Clinton did not storm in and get over 2,000 killed for nothing.
posted by
scoop
on November 3, 2005 at 4:35 PM
| link to this | reply
Shouldn't someone be held accountable ...
for getting the "intelligence" wrong? Or does that merit a another medal?
posted by
fwmystic
on November 3, 2005 at 4:31 PM
| link to this | reply
Xeno-x
Thank you for your...opinion.
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on November 3, 2005 at 3:47 PM
| link to this | reply
actually looks llke everybody was wrong.
but as I said below, there was no evidence for the existence of WMD's, the CIA knew it, but the Bush Administration didn't want to hear that.
posted by
Xeno-x
on November 3, 2005 at 2:41 PM
| link to this | reply
it's fact and recorded
I mentioned this in another blog but i'll mention it again
original intelligence could not support the Bush line of WMD's in Iraq. Bushites pressured the CIA to change their reports to reflect what the Administration wanted them to reflect.
CIA decided to send the ambassador to Niger to find out if there was a basis for the report that they'd sold Iraq nuclear materials -- found out there was no basis.
Bush then reported that UK had discovered that Iraq had gotten nuclear materials from Africa.
ambassador then told newspaper that this wasn't true.
then the Bushites decided to blow the ambassador's wife's cover as a CIA Agent.
Bush's offenses are a hell of a lot more impeachable than Clinton's ever were.
a program of lying to invade another sovereign country, losing over 2,000 U.S. lives in the process.
a very illegal war.
posted by
Xeno-x
on November 3, 2005 at 2:38 PM
| link to this | reply
Justsouno
My point exactly........but now the anti-war leftists and the LIBDems in Congress are mounting a campaign to make it look like that was the way we went into the war......based on GW lying to us all.
Yet they were saying the same things before, during and after we went into Iraq.
Now because they are sooooooo desperate to regain their power....they suddenly have collective memory loss over what they said and make it look like we mislead America.......now that is the BIG LIE.
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on November 3, 2005 at 2:11 PM
| link to this | reply
Corbin
Okay people who lied, who all lied, did anyone lie?
posted by
Justi
on November 3, 2005 at 1:53 PM
| link to this | reply