Go to Should Bush Be Impeached?
- Add a comment
- Go to The Present Administration: They Are All Despicable, Draft-dodging Cowards
Damon, Hahahaha!
posted by
kingmi
on June 21, 2005 at 10:09 AM
| link to this | reply
All Righty...
...then - late, but accurate and heart-felt!
1. How many think GWB should be tried for war crimes?
DEFINITELY
2. How many think he should be impeached for lying:
a. That the Iraqi dictator had WMD's?
DEFINITELY - NOW PROVEN
b. That he had the invasion intended from pre-911, and the plan firm in his mind before Summer 2002?
DEFINITELY - NOW PROVEN
c. That he approved torture on a wide-scale, wide-ranging basis?
DEFINITELY - close to proven
d. That he is guilty of genocide against the Iraqi people, who are fighting back valliantly?
NO
I am serious. I would really like to know. Or how many think he is a hero?
NOW YOU'RE BEING SILLY!!!
D
posted by
DamonLeigh
on June 21, 2005 at 10:06 AM
| link to this | reply
Burly, we can't take them one at a time, times have changed,
people are starting to see the light on Iraq, if Bush was as popular as he was when he was elected, we would be filling our military ranks, but he is not and we are not. The parents who are putting the heat on their kids not to enlist are not all democrats that is for sure. When you see the news today and five more Marines are killed it just puts more fuel on the taxpayer fire. Even the spirit of the servicemen and women who have been deployed to Iraq 2 and 3 times are starting to wane.
posted by
scoop
on June 10, 2005 at 5:42 PM
| link to this | reply
Burly,
The Army is having trouble getting the numbers! Why not put on your boots! Maybe you have a son or daughter? Grand? Uncle? Cousin? Maybe George can give us a hand in this "war on terror"?
posted by
Glennb
on June 10, 2005 at 5:33 PM
| link to this | reply
Scoop
You have to take them one at a time!
posted by
Burly
on June 10, 2005 at 12:55 PM
| link to this | reply
Sorry Burly, I respect you but saying that and I quote you
"Bush is trying his best to hunt down and kill the people who would kill us" I can’t agree with you. Afghanistan yes, Iraq no, we did not go there to fight terrorism. Supposedly we went to remove 1-WMD, 2-remove an evil dictator and then "mission creep" kicked in and 3-we went to give them a democracy.
If Bush wants to go after terrorists he needs to go to Syria, Saudi Arabia, and the rest of the scumbag countries that are hiding them. Remember this 15 of the 19 highjackers were from Saudi Arabia, one from Egypt, another from Lebanon and two from the United Arab Emirates.
posted by
scoop
on June 10, 2005 at 11:56 AM
| link to this | reply
BURLY
Your exactly right about that. We must never forget the reasons. I was reading today where the democratic movement in Iran is ready to break wide open too. Wonder what they will say about that? They definitely won't give our W the credit, even though he called for it in his address.
posted by
Offy
on June 10, 2005 at 11:53 AM
| link to this | reply
Burly,
You were sent here to spread the same manure that we get from FOX, CNN, and other outlets of spin! We pay here so we get to respond! You are a lying garbage truck to biing that Poopoo here to Blogit! Get out!
posted by
Glennb
on June 10, 2005 at 11:30 AM
| link to this | reply
Offbeatpub,
Let me see?? Never mind! You are so full of crap that if I bite you I would get a mouth full of Poopoo! This "bitting thing" maybe that should be explored? How old are you anyway? If I might ask?
posted by
Glennb
on June 10, 2005 at 11:26 AM
| link to this | reply
Terrorism
Bush is trying his best to hunt down and kill the people who would kill us and have, 3000 in New York and more than 200 at the Pentagon, not to mention everyone who perished on those hi-jacked planes. The left is more interested in him and his supposed motives. We're at war! Look at the enemy or perish!!
posted by
Burly
on June 10, 2005 at 11:23 AM
| link to this | reply
Kingmi
None. This man is in the highest position, probably in all the world. He knows more than we hear. He makes decisions based on information he is given. When the GUTLESS WONDERS CALLED THE UN (mainly the French) failed to support UNR 441, they forced the hand. He didn't back down, by God that takes GUTS. Were there WMD's? You better believe it, from all nations who did business with the twin of Hitler. How many people have to die before you say ENOUGH? How many can fit into a mass grave before people realize the idiot Saddam was the WMD? I love George Bush, I would follow him into battle anytime. I know he didn't shoot his general's because they knew the war plan better. Love a man who can make a tough decision.
Before old Glen B has anything smart to say about what I think, just remember, the question was asked by Kingmi to us all..so if you start with your soapbox bull crap, BITE ME~~
posted by
Offy
on June 10, 2005 at 11:08 AM
| link to this | reply
Hi. I'm new here. Enjoyed your post. As John Kerry said during the campaign against Bush, "I can't believe I'm losing to this idiot?!" I couldn't believe the idiotic voters, either.
posted by
MedusaNextDoor
on June 10, 2005 at 8:45 AM
| link to this | reply
Kingmi,
If Iraq and Saddam Hussein had weapons comming out of their ears, George Bus still lied to get American into Iraq! War criminal! Give me fifteen minutes with a Judge's robe and a courtroom to lock this buffoon up!
Say it! "War Criminal"!!! It makes me feel better and so will you1
posted by
Glennb
on June 9, 2005 at 3:30 PM
| link to this | reply
FLIGHTPATH,
We know what you think! But we need people who can think to think! Bush is a "Chicken Hawk" (credit to the orginal)! Where was he when the heat was on for about ten seconds in September of 2001? Hiding until the dust clears (sorry fot the reference)!
posted by
Glennb
on June 9, 2005 at 3:26 PM
| link to this | reply
kingmi -I really am serious. I really think Bush is a hero.
posted by
reasons
on June 9, 2005 at 2:19 PM
| link to this | reply