Comments on When is $500 too little for an article?

Go to Azur's Musings & MissivesAdd a commentGo to When is $500 too little for an article?

Oceandancer, a few years back I had the best gig possible. I wrote whatever stories I proposed and was paid at a good market rate. these gigs must be enjoyed while they last. This one unraveled after 9/11

posted by Azur on April 9, 2005 at 2:25 PM | link to this | reply

DarrkeThoughts, I try to use my energy wisely because my supply of that commodity is not what it was. Lately I blew it--overcommitting myself and now with a health issue possibly looming I will really have to make sure to get back to jobs that don't squander my reserves. As I say it took me 20 years to get to that point and also to get any sense of my value. I am also optimistic I can improve on that. I want to give hope because after all, if I can do it so can others

posted by Azur on April 9, 2005 at 2:20 PM | link to this | reply

Getting paid sounds great to me.   I'm looking forward to the day I can worry about "how much"...

posted by DarrkeThoughts on April 9, 2005 at 1:08 PM | link to this | reply

Luckily I get to write whatever I want.
Sorta makes up for the pitiful amount I get paid.

posted by Oceandancer on April 9, 2005 at 6:41 AM | link to this | reply

L.E.Gant, it is a business and that's the only way to think about it.
My niche is an ability to handle complex subjects.

They sure know that they get a good deal from me and that's why they keep coming back. However, I try to do so much only that is useful to me and that I enjoy - exposure etc and a steady-ish income and often readers email me and ask if I can write for them. It is those factors which really add value
I see a lot of sites where people write articles for $15-30 a piece. In those cases too people are seeking exposure and a stepping stone.

posted by Azur on April 9, 2005 at 12:03 AM | link to this | reply

It's a BUSINESS!!!

The trouble is that editors (the people that pay you the $500) don't recognise that you are working on your time, not their's. They forget that their staff get paid their $20 to $50 per hour, and get the telephones paid for, and lunches and all the rest. But they do realise that, at $500 for an article, they are generally getting a bargain (a cut-rate price) from free lancers. Sure, it might sound like anything but: a staffer at $50 per hour would spend 10 hours (Ha!) doing the same thing, but, by the time the other costs of having staff get factored in, you cost only about 3/4 of what they would for the same article.

But that'sthe joys of being a freelancer (or independent consultant - I usually get around $250 per hour, but I'm not much better off than someone getting paid $30 an hour!).

posted by L.E.Gant on April 8, 2005 at 5:16 PM | link to this | reply

I don't think that
but maybe your brain is congested from absorbing so much. You are probably writing a lot more then me. I have a real problem of retaining everything that I have learned. Maybe that is why I get so many headaches.

posted by Sherri_G on April 8, 2005 at 3:36 PM | link to this | reply

Sassyass64. It's good that you learn something. I forget most things as soon as I file them. When I read them in the paper I can't believe that I wrote it. By then it seems so foreign. I think I forget to make room for the next thing --maybe my brain is too small

posted by Azur on April 8, 2005 at 3:34 PM | link to this | reply

That sounds about right
I also write about subjects that I know virtually nothing about. The researching is the fun part for me if its an interesting subject. Not only do I get a pretty paycheck, I learn something new. The experience is also beneficial. $500 for 600 words is great. I get that for about 1,200 words. I of course have no where near the experience that you do, but I will get there eventually.

posted by Sherri_G on April 8, 2005 at 3:31 PM | link to this | reply

JohnMcNab, it is hard work although there is a formula. preparing original material with interviews is labor-intensice. Not only that it depends very much onthe complexity of the subject

posted by Azur on April 8, 2005 at 2:31 PM | link to this | reply

MayB

I had daydreams of becoming a reporter once until I realised I'd have to interview real people.  Last year I emailed a UK trade magazine which I'd written for previously, asking if they would like an article from the Canadian point of view.  It wasn't until they said 'yes' that I remembered the interviewing part.   I still haven't done it and probably never will.  It could be called laziness, I suppose. 

What you are doing sounds like hard work to me, MayB.

posted by johnmacnab on April 8, 2005 at 2:26 PM | link to this | reply