Comments on In democracies, should voters accept the election results?

Go to Bill's Parker Add a commentGo to In democracies, should voters accept the election results?

BC-A

Not necessarily!!!!!!!!!

posted by WileyJohn on November 13, 2016 at 3:56 PM | link to this | reply

Yes one must though it seems that there are nearly equal parties in some countries now and this makes it difficult to make progress. 

posted by C_C_T on November 13, 2016 at 10:01 AM | link to this | reply

I do believe that voters should accept most election results. Obviously, there are going to be exceptions. Just because Nixon was elected does not mean that he should have been allowed to finish out his second term for instance. Clearly, if there is a Hitler type to gets into office that person needs to be addressed. For all his warts, I do not see Trump as a Hitler type.

posted by FormerStudentIntern on November 13, 2016 at 6:31 AM | link to this | reply

I can only say what I personally should do, and you will find that in the blog that I just posted before reading yours.

posted by TAPS. on November 12, 2016 at 2:15 PM | link to this | reply

There are many results around the globe we do NOT accept; Earth is without

a uniform standard: double and triple standards prevail. Clinton was expected to be without sin; and Trump, to be forgiven, forgiven, forgiven ... So it just depends on a mix of Christianity and power politics, I guess. (My best shot at r gr8 question, Bill).

posted by NocrossJustchristmas on November 12, 2016 at 1:56 PM | link to this | reply

True Democracy means majority rules...I believe most democratic countries have altered this to some extent.

posted by Kabu on November 12, 2016 at 1:24 PM | link to this | reply