Comments on My very first "repost." But for Halloween, I believe it's apropos . . .

Go to From The Observation DeckAdd a commentGo to My very first "repost." But for Halloween, I believe it's apropos . . .

Re: jimmy

I can only hope, jean, that she did it just for the entertainment value, and not to traumatize you in any way! Personally, I've never been into what has become known as 'slasher movies,' where some nut runs amok with a meat cleaver or a chainsaw, cutting up unsuspecting campers or college students. That's not very entertaining to me! But a tale like this, with far more depth and underlining details, is a lot more interesting and suspenseful than it is scary. And the original movie being in black & white only adds to the suspense, as far as I'm concerned . . . 

posted by JimmyA on November 2, 2014 at 9:32 AM | link to this | reply

Re:

I understand, lovelylady. Reading about 'dead things' being brought back to life may not be everyone's cup of tea. However, it is one of the most famous novels and tales of all time. I just think it's a little better that people fully understand what it's really all about . . . 

posted by JimmyA on November 2, 2014 at 9:28 AM | link to this | reply

Re:

Thanks, Bill. Yes, there probably are many subtle messages hidden in those pages, like the alienation or social injustice you mentioned, a much deeper tale than just that of some monster awakened and terrorizing the countryside. Sometimes we need to read between the lines to fully understand things. This story is probably no different . . .   

posted by JimmyA on November 2, 2014 at 9:25 AM | link to this | reply

Re: Jimmy

It wouldn't hurt, Naut, especially if you did read the actual novel. Like I wrote, director James Whale did his absolute best to maintain the integrity and passion of Mary Shelly's book, bringing both the creation and the tale to life! And of course, you just can't beat Boris Karloff as the monster! It's definitely worth a look . . . 

posted by JimmyA on November 2, 2014 at 9:22 AM | link to this | reply

Re:

Yes, they did, adnohr, and not a Frankenstein in the bunch! I'm glad this little essay awakened some interest in you about this particular monster. But I will suggest, if you ever decide to actually sit down and watch any movie related to Frankenstein, go for the 'original' with Colin Clive and Boris Karloff. Hollywood took many liberties over the years with the various 'remakes,' none of which do the original tale any justice! And I would consider it more suspenseful than a 'horror' flick. Just try not to let the shadows play tricks on you while you're watching it . . . 

posted by JimmyA on November 2, 2014 at 9:18 AM | link to this | reply

Re: JimmyA

Thanks, Sir Wiley. It's amazing sometimes what we think we know about a certain topic or tale. Even Frankenstein has a lot of depth to it! Glad you enjoyed your 'monster history lesson' . . . 

posted by JimmyA on November 2, 2014 at 9:13 AM | link to this | reply

Re:

It brought back some memories, eh, Kabu? And at least, were the monster suddenly let loose once again, you could fly high above the carnage on that broom!  And yes, I do remember lustor love, but am not aware of her current situation. Enjoy that visit . . . 

posted by JimmyA on November 2, 2014 at 9:11 AM | link to this | reply

Re:

It is indeed, FSI. I have a feeling that not many people have actually read that particular novel, but are still very much aware of the general story and the 'main' character! But looking at "the creation" as more than a mere monster is what this post is all about. Judge not lest ye be judged . . . 

posted by JimmyA on November 2, 2014 at 9:09 AM | link to this | reply

jimmy

really enjoyed this post, and i was brought up on scary movies....my mother took me to scary movies from the time i was born i think. lol

posted by jeansaw on November 2, 2014 at 8:30 AM | link to this | reply

Interesting story in itself.  I did know that Frankenstein was not the doctor's name, believe it or not!  Still, I must confess, I have no desire to read the story...

posted by lovelyladymonk on November 1, 2014 at 6:58 PM | link to this | reply

Might be a message of alienation or social injustice. Some would say good on his fate. An interesting post Jimmy.

posted by BC-A on November 1, 2014 at 1:34 PM | link to this | reply

Jimmy

Very interesting! I've read the book and know it's background in general, but you've got details here new to me...And I've never seen any of the movies - maybe I should...

posted by Nautikos on November 1, 2014 at 9:20 AM | link to this | reply

Wow - interesting. Thanks for this, Jimmy. Horror stories are not my thing - I've not seen the movie nor read the book, but this post is making me curious, so maybe I'll do that now. Hope your monsters came for candy only....

posted by adnohr on November 1, 2014 at 2:47 AM | link to this | reply

JimmyA

My only history education on Frankenstein, you wrote a marvelous lesson my friend,

posted by WileyJohn on October 31, 2014 at 7:30 PM | link to this | reply

just back from a most invigorating ride on the broom. Setting out soon for the US border to meet a friend...remember Lustor love?????/ anyway a nice take on Frankenstein, I enjoyed remembering what I used to know.

posted by Kabu on October 31, 2014 at 6:24 PM | link to this | reply

A very interesting history about Frankenstein. I have not read the book, but I have seen the movies. That scene with the blind man is powerful.

posted by FormerStudentIntern on October 31, 2014 at 10:37 AM | link to this | reply