Comments on Why Bush should be impeached.

Go to The decline & fall of the USA. - Add a comment - Go to Why Bush should be impeached.

Get Real

posted by katsmow on January 14, 2004 at 6:51 PM | link to this | reply

Wrongheaded again!

Dum-and-Evil:

Ignorance is your biggest problem. You've got so many delusions it would take an army of psychologists several decades just to categorize them! The facts are: Bushboy is president (unfortunately) not Clinton and Bushboy invaded Iraq after lying about WMDs, nuclear material purchases and Al Qaeda connections (all of which have been proven to be baseless). Paul O'Neill's "lies" as you call them, have not been disputed by the Bushboy WH, they just try to smear him and BTW, O'Neill has receive NO MONEY for his contributions to Ron Suskind's new book, "The Price of Loyalty," which you should read but I'm sure you won't.

Bushboy deserves impeachment for telling lies that have caused the deaths of nearly 500 American soldiers, thousands of innocent Iraqis and wasted hundreds of billions in American treasure for his war in Iraq. Meanwhile, here in the USA the states are in deficits and are cutting police, fire fighters and teachers, while our roads and bridges crumble and our electrical grid breaks down.

If you weren't so delusional you might be able to recognize that you live in a fantasyland, where Evil is Good and where Incompetence is Capability. Try learning the facts ("real facts" is a redundancy) and perhaps it will help you grow up.

posted by spyinthesky on January 14, 2004 at 5:41 AM | link to this | reply

ONEIL LIED LIKE FRANKEN

What about Clinton???
Not to change the subject, But much of what Bush did about Saddam Hussein was actually started during the Clinton years. Remember it was Clinton who first attacked Hussein after saying this in a speech:

CLINTON 1998: "If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." The stakes, he says, could not be higher. "Some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal."

Impeached? Yes, maybe Hillary will be for her complicity of aiding the enemies in Iraq with her bashing of the Presidents policies during wartime.

Check out the real facts concerning O'Neill and his bought lies!
O'NeillBUSTED

posted by DEMSareEVIL on January 14, 2004 at 2:04 AM | link to this | reply

One hopes that this latest charge starts from an archconservative like O'Neill begins the unravelling process of this most evil asshole "president."

Oh, yeah: I AM a Bush-hater. And proud of it.

Shawn

posted by ShawnMichel on January 12, 2004 at 7:29 PM | link to this | reply

The impeachment process.

Damon: unfortunately the impeachment process of a US President must begin in the House of Representatives which then brings the articles (or charges) to the Senate for judgement. With the Republican thugs that control both houses of Congress, it is not likely that they will impeach a sitting Republican president, no matter how corrupt, dishonest or incompetent. The only thing that could motivate them to do it is if there was a huge (and I do mean huge) outcry from the American people for this kind of action. The only thing less likely than a Gooper Congress impeaching a Gooper president is the American people giving a damn about being ruled by a lying and inept fool like Bush.

Katray: Thanks for the website sweetie. I will check it out.

posted by spyinthesky on January 12, 2004 at 12:11 PM | link to this | reply

Right on target, Spy!!

Here is a link to a good site about impeachment. Very informative and instructive.

http://www.impeach-bush-now.org/

Now, let's get to work!!

                                                    Katray.

 

 

posted by PoetRaye on January 12, 2004 at 9:47 AM | link to this | reply

So What's...

...the process, Spy? Who kicks off an impeachment hearing? Who has the power to bring it about? Surely in the land of 'by the people, for the people', anyone could begin this process? Right? Or not?

D

posted by DamonLeigh on January 12, 2004 at 9:37 AM | link to this | reply