Comments on THAT HAD TO BE THE MOST INSULTINGLY IGNORANT COMMENT I HAVE EVER SEEN

Go to DON'T READ MY BLOGS - Add a comment - Go to THAT HAD TO BE THE MOST INSULTINGLY IGNORANT COMMENT I HAVE EVER SEEN

kooka_lives - saying something like this indicates a much larger issue

Anyone of adult age should have enough grey matter to realize that the love of a parent for their children is universal. It follows that all universal human traits should simply be conceded but typical of those people who have taken philosophical differences of opinion to a childish level, they are incapable of this.

They are also not capable of ever realizing that these infantile reactions to those they disagree with, belies everything they claim to stand for.  

posted by gomedome on April 27, 2009 at 12:10 PM | link to this | reply

Crobin, wow what a surprise this is

Not really.  I was excepting this kind of thing.

Of course you are going to defend this blogger.  He's a mindless, MAC sheep just like you.  As far as your MAC sheep are concerned, you guys can do and say whatever you want and none of it is wrong in the least.  It is clear what that blogger was saying, but because I am the one who is upset by his insult, you are going to side with him and make up whatever BS justification you can pull from your ass to defend him while attacking me.

What he said was a true insult towards all parents, and that is clear.  I can very much understand how much he can love his children, because it is most likely a whole lot like how I love my children.  To believe that the way you love your children is somehow greater or different in way that no one else could possible understand is just egotistical and insulting.

And you need to learn to read better I clearly said "victim of randomly poisoned Halloween candy".  The case you found was NOT random.  Deliberately targeted or accidentally poisoned candy has happened, which is NOT the same as randomly poisoned.  In the O'Bryan case you mention, there was no random element to it.  It was purely targeted.  Now he did give poisoned pixie sticks to his daughter and three of their friends as well to try and cover it up, but that was still NOT random.  The simple FACT is that there has NEVER been any case of a child dying from RANDOMLY poisoned Halloween candy.  That blogger I talked about tried to claim otherwise and made up a pure, provable lie to defend her beliefs of this propaganda.

posted by kooka_lives on April 26, 2009 at 10:41 AM | link to this | reply

You Need To Take A Chill Pill......Dude...

Your irrational side is beginning to take control.

"Our children are loved more than you or anyone else will ever be able to understand."  This blogger is out right saying that he and his wife love their children more than ANYONE ELSE could possible love their own children.

I don't see that in his comment at all......he's stating you or anyone else couldn't understand how much he loves his children.........I doubt if anyone could totally understand how a parent loves their children.......give it a rest'

Try and focus the anger in your posts on topics not other Bloggers......

As to children being poisoned on halloween......NEVER say NEVER........

Ronald Clark O'Bryan (nicknamed The Candyman) (October 19, 1944 – March 31, 1984) was a murderer from Pasadena in the U.S. state of Texas who killed his eight-year-old son Timothy on Halloween, 1974 with cyanide-laced candy in order to claim $30,000 in life insurance. He had also distributed poisoned candy to other children (none of whom ate it) in an attempt to cover up his crime. O'Bryan had recently taken out a $30,000 life insurance policy on each of his children, Timothy and Elizabeth. Elizabeth did not eat any of the tainted candy.

posted by Corbin_Dallas on April 26, 2009 at 3:06 AM | link to this | reply