Comments on Louis Farrakhan, That's Who!

Go to Obama Is In Touch With Who? - Add a comment - Go to Louis Farrakhan, That's Who!

You would at least think the party of death would ask why Obama went to that hatemonger church and why he won't show the American public his records? What's he hiding?

posted by mordent on October 12, 2008 at 8:05 AM | link to this | reply

The ridiculous statements in this post can only make me shout, BAH!!

Obama doesn't have to bring this nation to its knees, we are already there thanks to conservatives and Republicans and chicken Democrats.....

The things that you say are so OUT THERE as to require seminars to instruct you in the wrong thinking that you do.

But, it wouldn't matter as your hatred for so many of us keeps you from hearing anything but the voices in your head and those of your peeps.

posted by benzinha on October 11, 2008 at 3:13 PM | link to this | reply

Voices

I kind of have the feeling you shouldn't be speaking in the name of us atheists, as your pronouncements don't agree with our thinking in any way.  All the atheists I know are at best tepid supporters of Obama, as his policy proposals are more in line with our thinking that McCain's.  We dislike Farrakhan.  We oppose imposition of any religion on anyone, and find Islam particularly repressive and dangerous.  See Nautikos' wonderful series on the relationship between Islam and government in Islamic countries.

But I, for one, am not afraid on Muslims trying to overthrow the American government and impose Islamic rule here.  Some Muslims are trying to harm American interests, and affect American policy in the international sphere, and using terrorists tactic.  We must oppose such groups, and pursue justice for all who participate in such criminal activities.  But the Iraq war had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks on America.  And we atheists know that even under Senator Obama's plan for Iraq, a substantial force of American soldiers will remain in Iraq for years to pursue those terrorists in the country.  That hardly constitutes a surrender to terrorists.

posted by mousehop on October 11, 2008 at 7:45 AM | link to this | reply