Go to sarooster on politics
- Add a comment
- Go to How Crazy Is This?
As Corbin has suggested, sarooster, it all lies in the elimination of
unjustifiable collateral damage. House-to-house, hand-to-hand may be more dangerous, but it is far less costly in "collateral damage" or civilian casualties, therefore far less bad public relations, internationally, in Afghanistan, and domestically...
posted by
saul_relative
on
December 11, 2007
at
9:11 PM
| |
reply
We get into conflicts where we are damned if we and damned if we don't>>>>>>a catch 22>>>sam
posted by
sam444
on
December 10, 2007
at
6:51 AM
| |
reply
Then we'd be accused......
of killing another million civilians.......don't you see???
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on
December 10, 2007
at
4:28 AM
| |
reply
Copy (or write down) this comment's web address (URL), which is:
Next, go to the email or web page where you want to link to this comment, and paste
(or type) the web address.
