Comments on EVOLUTIONARY ERRORS

Go to THE WORKINGS OF THE UNIVERSEAdd a commentGo to EVOLUTIONARY ERRORS

bpitter
The article you linked to did not back up you claims here.  The article itself still talked about mankind evolving from apes, just saying they need to redefine the time frame in which the off branching happened.  The article itself says that the skull is a fossil that shows that man evolved from the same group that chimps came from, just as a different time frame than originally thought.
 
And SOME scientists will agree with you, not all.  The key word is 'designed' here.  We are an incredibly adapted species, which scientists will all agree on.  But that is not the same as being designed.

posted by kooka_lives on December 31, 2007 at 3:01 PM | link to this | reply

Furthermore,
I believe we are an incredibly designed species. Even scientists can't deny that!

posted by b2008 on December 31, 2007 at 2:30 PM | link to this | reply

Re: bpitter

The point being that if the earliest fossils of humankind were deemed to be totally human and not primate, how can you say man evolved from a primate? There are basically no fossils to substantiate that man evolved in that manner within any kind of time frame. So what proof do you have to the contrary. That was my point.

But you had so many blogs together that I guess I got confused on which one I was answering.

posted by b2008 on December 31, 2007 at 2:28 PM | link to this | reply

bpitter
I read the article you linked to on another post (Which is I guess the one you are talking about here) and I am a little lost as to what your point is about it.  The article did nothing to disprove anything I have stated here nor did it go against evolution in the least.
 
Could you maybe explain what point you are trying to make from what is said in the article?

posted by kooka_lives on December 31, 2007 at 12:50 PM | link to this | reply

You don't seem to be reading...
...any of the articles I've read. The one I read showed photos of the oldest known skull of man and it was not an ape's skull. It was definitely human.

posted by b2008 on December 30, 2007 at 3:27 PM | link to this | reply

Copy (or write down) this comment's web address (URL), which is:

Next, go to the email or web page where you want to link to this comment, and paste (or type) the web address.

Referrals - About Us - Press - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Conduct Policy - Try Gozoof!
Copyright © 2009 Shaycom Corporation. All rights reserved.