Comments on No Way Were Sara Silverman's Jokes To Blame For Britney's Botch Job

Go to The Flatliner DiariesAdd a commentGo to No Way Were Sara Silverman's Jokes To Blame For Britney's Botch Job

Britney Spears is very sensitive to Sara's comments

posted by adventurer02 on August 20, 2015 at 1:29 AM | link to this | reply

Beautiful, 7stars. Thank you so much...

posted by saul_relative on September 30, 2007 at 8:35 AM | link to this | reply


FANCY PANTS

posted by star4sky5 on September 29, 2007 at 9:52 PM | link to this | reply

Sara Silverman has taken cutesy bathroom humor to new septic depths, PatB.
Some days I pray for the return of Gilda Radner, Paula Poundstone, Elaine Boosler.  I saw Brett Butler a couple years ago in Richmond.  Now, there's a funny woman.  I'd rather hear Roseanne Barr sing the national anthem again (as painful as that would be) than ever see Sara Silverman... uh... perform (yeah, that's a hopefully descrptive word of what she does) again, period. 

posted by saul_relative on September 16, 2007 at 8:01 AM | link to this | reply

There are so many points I want to respond to here...
Sara Silverman's humor -- I thought maybe I was the only one who didn't get it. You've helped me realize I'm not so stupid after all.  Britney's bad act -- I didn't see the performance, just the re-runs, and Ellen is right. Her agent/manager/team should have pulled the performance if she wasn't ready. All the finger-pointing and apologizing aside, everyone screws up sometimes, big effing deal. As for your non-apologetic rant... Great writing and funny...  

posted by Pat_B on September 16, 2007 at 7:46 AM | link to this | reply

Thank you, Azur. Sometimes I find venting cathartic, sometimes just
a rambling summation of raw frustration...

posted by saul_relative on September 15, 2007 at 10:10 PM | link to this | reply

Please rant whenever you wish
I enjoyed this.

posted by Azur on September 15, 2007 at 8:42 PM | link to this | reply

Thanks, Soul Builder. Most of the time, I try not to rant. Occasionally,
I must...

posted by saul_relative on September 13, 2007 at 7:40 PM | link to this | reply

Saul R..........
Quite a nice way of getting your views in. Enjoyed reading this!

posted by Soul_Builder101 on September 13, 2007 at 5:39 PM | link to this | reply

Don't worry, .Dave, she's like a soap opera. You can miss months of the
stuff and come back to catch up in just a couple of minutes...

posted by saul_relative on September 13, 2007 at 11:59 AM | link to this | reply

I'm gonna have to catch up on the latest Britney stuff. I'm out of that particular loop a little at the moment.

posted by _dave_says_ack_ on September 13, 2007 at 11:12 AM | link to this | reply

thanks, riri...

posted by saul_relative on September 13, 2007 at 11:01 AM | link to this | reply

You could have a point on Adaptation, M. I would first have to see the
movie, however.  Wouldn't want to call people I don't know "stupid" without any evidence on my part.  And humor is subjective.  My wife thinks Steven Wright is "okay" while I think he's hilarious.  She thinks the show "The Single Life" is hilarious while I think it has it's moments.  She hates Monty Python; I love Python.  Of course, she's never seen any of the movies, but I don't hold out much hope...

posted by saul_relative on September 13, 2007 at 11:01 AM | link to this | reply

posted by riri0322 on September 13, 2007 at 10:58 AM | link to this | reply

Well, I can't argue with that last point.

However, nevertheless, there's certainly still a place for crudity and childishness in comedy (when done with aplomb).

Besides, humor is obviously extremely subjective, anyways. For instance, most of my friends didn't think "Adaptation" was funny. But that doesn't make them "wrong" ... just stupid.

Instead of mousetraps,
what about baby traps?
Not to harm the babies,
but just to hold them down
until they can be safely removed.

posted by Mademoiselle on September 13, 2007 at 10:50 AM | link to this | reply

Well, M., she'd still be nothing worth mentioning if she hadn't been
sitting beside Kimmel's desk all these last few years.  It got her nonexistent career its much needed (and undeserved) boost.  And I find her humor crass, trite, and a bit on the childish side.  She has her moments, but, you know what they say, put a bunch of monkeys on pianos... Anyway, it's just my opinion, but I wouldn't walk in Sara Silverman's shoes or bother to piss in their general direction.  There are far more intelligent and homorous comediennes out there than she -- Amy Madigan, Ellen Degeneres, Kathy Griffin, Rita Rudner, Judy Gold, Wanda Sykes, Barbara Walters, Katie Couric, Ann Coulter.  Damn, M., your blog is more funny in the first couple of lines than her half hour show on Comedy Central is in three combined episodes...    

posted by saul_relative on September 13, 2007 at 10:33 AM | link to this | reply

My pleasure, opheliablue...

posted by saul_relative on September 13, 2007 at 10:23 AM | link to this | reply

Okay, first of all ...

Sara Silverman was (reasonably) famous/popular well before Jimmy Kimmel (and he's not exactly David Letterman, btw ... or even Conan O'Brian, for that matter).

Secondly, she's very funny. Maybe not so much on the VMAs, but at least in general.

Before you criticize someone,
you should walk a mile in their shoes.
That way, when you criticize them,
you're a mile away
and you have their shoes.

posted by Mademoiselle on September 13, 2007 at 9:58 AM | link to this | reply

*snigger*
It's not often that something really does make me LOL, but that line about Tupac sure did!  Thanks for the laughs, it's a great way to start the day!

posted by opheliablue on September 12, 2007 at 11:56 PM | link to this | reply

What?

posted by saul_relative on September 12, 2007 at 9:25 PM | link to this | reply

?
Roses from me and Bo =^..^= the wonder dog!

posted by Whacky on September 12, 2007 at 9:18 PM | link to this | reply