Go to Sannhetseeker
- Add a comment
- Go to An Interesting Explanation of the Tree of Life
OTA -
Thank you! And thanks for stopping by and visiting.
posted by
sannhet
on September 16, 2007 at 8:18 AM
| link to this | reply
Moon my friend -
Thanks to you!
posted by
sannhet
on September 16, 2007 at 8:17 AM
| link to this | reply
Troosha -
I'm glad you liked it. Thanks for the visit!
posted by
sannhet
on September 16, 2007 at 8:17 AM
| link to this | reply
Shams -
You're welcome. And thanks for reading.
posted by
sannhet
on September 16, 2007 at 8:16 AM
| link to this | reply
FineYoungSinger -
Thanks for stopping by and reading.
posted by
sannhet
on September 16, 2007 at 8:15 AM
| link to this | reply
SB -
Yes, I found it interesting as well. And actually, from what I have been able to gather, Jesus was more anti-Essene then Essene. He may have followed the teachings of more liberal Essenes, but was not a follower of the more strict and conservative sect found in the deserts near Judea. Thanks for the visit.
posted by
sannhet
on September 16, 2007 at 8:15 AM
| link to this | reply
Wonderful post. ~Peace, OTA
posted by
Blue_feathers
on September 16, 2007 at 8:15 AM
| link to this | reply
Rich -
My pleasure. Thanks for stopping by.
posted by
sannhet
on September 16, 2007 at 8:10 AM
| link to this | reply
Very, very well done Sannhet. Thanks for this. Moon 
posted by
syzygy
on September 15, 2007 at 4:02 PM
| link to this | reply
Sannet
Thanks for this - I enjoyed reading about it.
posted by
Troosha
on September 13, 2007 at 8:11 AM
| link to this | reply
Thanks for sharing great thoughts
posted by
Shams-i-Heartsong
on September 13, 2007 at 1:21 AM
| link to this | reply
very interesting.
posted by
FineYoungSinger
on September 12, 2007 at 5:43 PM
| link to this | reply
Sannhet
Very interesting model of existence. Wasn't Jesus under their tutelage? I read that somewhere!
posted by
Soul_Builder101
on September 12, 2007 at 5:37 PM
| link to this | reply
Hi san
thanks for sharing
posted by
richinstore
on September 12, 2007 at 5:24 PM
| link to this | reply