Comments on Iran Gets A Klu

Go to The Fine Art Of Subjective Fence Building - Add a comment - Go to Iran Gets A Klu

That I have, Nautikos. Disturbingly familiar. And you're right.

Iran is far more dangerous than that puny little malcontent on the Korean peninsula.  Too many End-of-the-Worlders looking for their messiahs these days.  The Shiites in Iran are no exception.  What kills is me is that their god and the Jewish god are the same god, yet they would destroy the Jews and Israel.   Unbelievable. 

posted by saul_relative on December 18, 2006 at 9:12 PM | link to this | reply

saul

excellent post! And you know, what troubles me is how little coverage there is in the media about Iran generally. There is always far more about that little inconsequential Korean thug. Ahmadinejad is far more dangerous, because he is a fanatic.

And have you seen the pictures of the Islamist storm troopers in their training camps, on parade, with their stiff-arm salute?

posted by Nautikos on December 18, 2006 at 2:43 PM | link to this | reply

It is an allignment of ideologies, Dylan, which can be one of convenience,

as well.  Duke is a Jew-baiting, Jew-hating ideologue.  I watched Wolf Blitzer try to interview him and watched him talk all over Blitzer.  (I believe part of it was Blitzer's strategy, considering the short, direct questions he actually put to Duke, like, "Do you hate Jews, Mr. Duke?")  He immediately attacked Blitzer's introduction of him and Blitzer's past association with a lobby group that was pro-Israel.  The man, a ridiculous caricature of intolerance, is revolting...

posted by saul_relative on December 16, 2006 at 10:44 AM | link to this | reply

I saw a video of Duke speaking in Syria.

I guess the anti-Semites of the world feel they have to stick together.

I wonder what the mostly dark-skinned Muslims think of Duke's belief in white supremacy, though.

Is this an alliance of convenience, or what?

posted by Dyl_Pickle on December 16, 2006 at 9:36 AM | link to this | reply

Hell of a recipe, Drew. Sadly, someone seems to dish it up about every

other generation. 

posted by saul_relative on December 15, 2006 at 10:23 AM | link to this | reply

Saul - another great post

There can be little debate as to the effect the Holocost has had on the Middle East.  The actions of the Nazis against the Jewish people during the late 30's and early 40's were instrumental in the formation of the state of Israel.  That is a fact, right or wrong is up for debate.  But to deny the Holocost can only bring the ridiculous and moronic to the side of Iran, a fact that is proven with the attendance of David Duke.  There can be academic debate as to the ethics of the creation of the state of Israel, but to deny the greatest human atrocity in mankind's history only weakens any stance that the government of Iran takes from here on. 

Recipe for hatred:  Take one totalitarian government, add the KKK, flush credibility down the toilet.  Serves 0.

posted by The_TAO_of_Drew on December 15, 2006 at 10:02 AM | link to this | reply

Thank you, afzal.

posted by saul_relative on December 14, 2006 at 10:56 PM | link to this | reply

Good post .

posted by afzal50 on December 14, 2006 at 10:52 PM | link to this | reply