Go to SMOKING BUBBLEGUM
- Add a comment
- Go to MY THOUGHTS ON DISTRIBUTION LISTS
This all seems to be......"much ado about nothing"?
Shelly do you pay for your blog site? Write and post what every you want....if someone doesn't like it they don't have to read you....or comment. Way too much being made of this.......
OMHO
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on
July 21, 2006
at
5:23 AM
| |
reply
Passionflower, all this is for you
- I can't read any due respect in the way that you've launched into me there.
- Once Shelly made her post here on this issue, she placed herself upon a soapbox - she expressed an opinion in an open forum, which presumably she is now holding up for scrutiny and is also inviting responses upon, for or against. If I choose to come in here and reply to it, then I am standing near to Shelly's soapbox and I'm engaging in a debate which she has opened. Or are we just supposed to all agree with everything that's blogged?
- Although I spent a long time carefully answering the points that Shelly raised, Shelly is under no obligation to give me an answer. I'd like answers, but she's free not to give any. Anyone who knows me here, yourself and Shelly included, should know that I don't expect an answer, I'd like an answer. Also note that at the moment, I've answered them here and specifically not run off and jumped on the soapbox of my own blogs - I might do that later if I don't get any reasonable responses from Shelly or from you, but I haven't done it yet.
- You're not giving me any indication that you understand what my proposal is, you're just telling me to shut up - you're saying that I shouldn't pursue my opinions and I shouldn't correct misrepresentations of what my argument is - let's be clear on this once again: my argument is now and always has been that Dist List posting should be taken out of the ratings equation. It has never been that it should be banned. I'd be interested to know whether you've read what I said below and what your opinion on it is. It's simply not a match-winning argument to tell someone to shut up.
- Answering a person's argument, point by point, as I've done in my first comment here, is surely an adult way to go forward - you're surely not suggesting that a grown-up response would be to put up and shut up? That's a child's response.
- If I was to shut up, I don't think the debate would go away. It's been raised before by others and there are other bloggers here today who are in support of my proposal - just go to the Community area and see for yourself.
- Your definition of BS seems to be my questioning of the status quo, whereas I see myself as taking on the challenge of trying to sort out some of the BS that's been around ever since I joined this site - I too object to bloggers who have used Blogit in several different manners. But they're free to continue using it in the manner they see fit, and I'm free, surely, to question any of those manners which I regard as unfit.
Now if Shelly wants me to leave her alone, I'm perfectly happy to do so. If she doesn't want to continue the conversation she started with this post, then fine, but she hasn't said that to me, you've said it for her. Who's doing the bullying? I've asked her respectfully whether she intends to reply, but you're telling her not to and you're telling me to shut up!
posted by
_dave_says_ack_
on
July 21, 2006
at
1:33 AM
| |
reply
Passion, whoa...you go girl!! Thanks!
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 20, 2006
at
7:46 PM
| |
reply
Shelly...I don't think you should be co-erced into reading
ANYTHING AT ALL!
You're under NO Obligation to read anything you don't feel like reading. Don't be bullied!!!!!!!!!!!
posted by
Passionflower
on
July 20, 2006
at
7:08 PM
| |
reply
Dave, all due respect....
There wouldn't BE a debate, if you'd shut up! You're the one who is keeping the BS stirred up and I object to someone using Blogit in such a manner.
Now come down off your Soapbox and try to behave like a grown-up.
posted by
Passionflower
on
July 20, 2006
at
7:03 PM
| |
reply
Dave, will do.
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 20, 2006
at
4:38 PM
| |
reply
Shelly, that's fine. I can be patient. Just give me a nudge when you want
me to read your reply. I do want to hear it.
posted by
_dave_says_ack_
on
July 20, 2006
at
4:37 PM
| |
reply
Dear Dave, I have not given you reply yet because of personal
reasons. There was a big change in my life recently and I have been emotional. I shouldn't have brought up the subject of the lists, because I know I just don't have the energy for a debate, right now. That was my bad. Oh, and this isn't an excuse, I just don't feel up to it right now. I will look at your proposal again, and give my response when I am ready. Thanks.
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 20, 2006
at
4:35 PM
| |
reply
Hi Shelly,
You've still not given me an answer on my Dist List proposal. You said you were going to, but you haven't so far.
If you're not going to answer me, I think it's only fair that you tell me so. I keep coming back to read your reply, but it's not appeared yet.
I would really appreciate a reply.
Regards,
Dave.
posted by
_dave_says_ack_
on
July 20, 2006
at
4:17 PM
| |
reply
TAPS, thank you for your comment....
I agree, if the headline states that it is a list posted, then that gives a blogger the option to click or not...I have seen no tricky headlines when a list is posted.
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 20, 2006
at
3:57 PM
| |
reply
shellyb, Quite some time back I agreed to not read distribution lists and my name was put on a list for that somewhere. I agreed to do that because I don't like to read or post distribution lists anyway so it was no skin off of my nose. But, if someone wants to post one, it doesn't bother me at all as long as the title shows what it is so that I can move on. To me it is no big deal.
posted by
TAPS.
on
July 20, 2006
at
3:51 PM
| |
reply
Hahaha Shelly, yes I'll have to admit that!
posted by
RckyMtnActivist
on
July 20, 2006
at
3:33 PM
| |
reply
Rcky, LOL...I bet his sense of humor isn't the only thing that cheers
you up!

LOL
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 20, 2006
at
3:31 PM
| |
reply
Thanks Shelly....I'll feel better when my husband gets home...he always
cheers me up, he has a great sense of humor.
posted by
RckyMtnActivist
on
July 20, 2006
at
3:30 PM
| |
reply
Rcky, LOL....trust me, I know! LOL I'm sorry to hear it..
I hope you feel better soon!
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 20, 2006
at
3:26 PM
| |
reply
Shelly, well it's one of those days I am a bit under the weather....
no reason just a bit down..you know us women!
posted by
RckyMtnActivist
on
July 20, 2006
at
3:24 PM
| |
reply
Rcky, doing fine, and you?
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 20, 2006
at
3:19 PM
| |
reply
Hi Shelly, how are you doing today?
posted by
RckyMtnActivist
on
July 20, 2006
at
3:17 PM
| |
reply
Shelly,
I found the perfect answer to the burning question of the
Who I Read List: as soon as you know what it is, begin ignoring it. I have been doing that since Day One, and it has been very successful.
©



® ™

± ≠
posted by
Jack_Flash
on
July 20, 2006
at
2:33 AM
| |
reply
No answer for me then Shelly?
posted by
_dave_says_ack_
on
July 20, 2006
at
12:15 AM
| |
reply
Wow....
All of this over a distribution list? Personally, I won't do it....I might have a few people here that I read that I wouldn't want anyone else to know I do? Besides........it's your personal blog......you pay for....so you can do what you want.......
I like Shelly's.... If you don't like...don't click
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on
July 19, 2006
at
6:23 PM
| |
reply
Rcky, thank you! This is what I'm trying to tell these bloggers!
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:48 PM
| |
reply
Life's too short...there is more important stuff to disagree on! LOL
posted by
RckyMtnActivist
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:46 PM
| |
reply
Rcky, thanks...I didn't really want to get into this whole thing...
I just don't want the bloggers who do posts these lists to get criticized every time they do.
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:45 PM
| |
reply
Mari-am, thanks for stopping by!
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:42 PM
| |
reply
Thanks, A&B!!
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:41 PM
| |
reply
Hi Shelly....how are you? Boy I never realized this was such a hot topic.
I really don't care either way so I am keeping neutral. Sorry for all this going on however.
posted by
RckyMtnActivist
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:41 PM
| |
reply


posted by
A-and-B
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:41 PM
| |
reply
Nanaroo, LOL, how could you miss it?? LOL
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:41 PM
| |
reply
bel, I think it has too!
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:38 PM
| |
reply
Pat, good point!
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:37 PM
| |
reply
ShellyB, you are most welcomed!
posted by
MountainClimber57
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:36 PM
| |
reply
schatz, I toally agree!
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:36 PM
| |
reply
Mountain and Offbeats, thanks!
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:35 PM
| |
reply
Dave, I just got off of work..in a moment I will read your comment...
and have a reply...thanks.
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 19, 2006
at
2:27 PM
| |
reply
good points

you are the angle of the blogers hurts ,.
posted by
Rosetree
on
July 19, 2006
at
11:39 AM
| |
reply
Is there a reply coming for me, Shelly?
posted by
_dave_says_ack_
on
July 19, 2006
at
11:39 AM
| |
reply
Justi, my dear....there isn't much to miss...just the same old silly stuff.
posted by
shelly_b
on
July 19, 2006
at
10:54 AM
| |
reply
Shellyb
Well gee whizz I miss everything.
posted by
Justi
on
July 19, 2006
at
10:51 AM
| |
reply
Shelly, I couldn't agree more!
posted by
MandaLee
on
July 19, 2006
at
8:21 AM
| |
reply
Bel, that puts you in category four, I reckon, as listed in my last comment
Therefore, my proposal should make you happy. No more debate to get out of hand.
posted by
_dave_says_ack_
on
July 19, 2006
at
8:09 AM
| |
reply
shellyb

wow, I didn't know about all the discussion regarding distribution lists!
posted by
Nanaroo
on
July 19, 2006
at
7:42 AM
| |
reply
I can see both sides of this
and I simply just don't read dist lists. I don't care either way. What someone does on their own blog that they pay to have is their business. If I don't like it, then I don't click.
I do think the entire debate has gotten out of hand at this point.
posted by
bel_1965
on
July 19, 2006
at
7:39 AM
| |
reply
Shelly, here are some of my thoughts in response.
I wrote a long response to you when you commented on my Dist List post recently, but you don't appear to have read it. I'm not sure that you've read or understood the proposal I made to Blogit either. I hope to make myself clear here and have provided links for you to see what I've already said.
First of all, yes I will do anything I can to oppose the posting of Distribution Lists, you're dead right about that. I was opposing them before you arrived at Blogit and it may well be, in part, down to my persistent nagging that not so many of them are posted today. I introduced a voluntary code in order to persuade bloggers to choose not to post them. It is difficult however for old and new bloggers alike to choose not to post them when fellow bloggers continue to use them.
Your "Don't like, don't click" policy is sound. I operate it myself on Dist Lists and have encouraged others to do the same. I also operate it on entire blogs when I see fit. I would also encourage you and any other blogger who doesn't like the opposition to DLs to do the same. Don't click. If you hadn't read my DL post, you wouldn't have had anything to write about here. I'm not going to stop opposing the DL, so my advice to you would be not to click when you see me write a headline about it. You should follow your own policy and let me be.
Moving onto the lists themselves, yes I don't like the DL and I will never read one. But you cannot possibly have read my proposal judging by what you've said in this post. My proposal says this:
That Blogit should set up a not-for-clicks link to the DL, which is activated by bloggers based on their own personal choice.
Which means three things:
· Any blogger can allow access to their DL so all bloggers who like to POST them are happy
· If access is allowed to others, then any blogger can READ available lists whenever they choose to so all bloggers who like to read them are happy
· There is then no need for any blogger to post a DL to a blog so bloggers who DESPISE them as lazy attention-grabbing tricks are happy
If you then add in a fourth group of bloggers who couldn't give a monkey's about DLs and just want to write good stuff and read good stuff, then I believe ALL OF BLOGIT will be happy, because that fourth group will no longer have to put up with the battling on either side of the debate.
The only argument that I can see against this is that a blogger wants to keep the status quo because they know that if they post their DL, they will shoot up the rankings. If you've got any other arguments, please let me know. Even this post about DLs will have shot up the rankings today. People love them, people hate them or people are tired of the debate - my proposal makes everyone happy.
Lastly, your opinion as to what constitutes 'negativity' is not held by all, certainly not by myself. I actually see my moves to reform the availability of the DL as a positive move to make Blogit a more harmonious place.
So, read the proposal please and put forward your opinion about the proposal. Not your opinion about me, not your opinion about my blogs, not your opinion about my hatred of the DL - your opinion about the proposal itself.
***
As for the other stuff I can't stand about certain blogging tactics, we'll leave that for another day. The big five negatives, as I see it, are all tackled head-on in my newest blog which you have attacked here. If you don't like it, don't click.
***
Here is a link to the extensive replies I gave you which you don't appear to have read: permalink
Here is a link to the proposal I put to Blogit in the Community Area, which you also don't appear to have read: Please click here
And if you're still going to continue to tell me to shut up, fair enough, that's your choice. But I won't be shutting up - and that's my choice.
I'd like to hear what you've got to say, whether you say it here, on my blog, or in the Community Area where the proposal sits.
Regards,
Dave.
posted by
_dave_says_ack_
on
July 19, 2006
at
7:34 AM
| |
reply
Well, IMHO - printing a distribution list is a non-issue
It doesn't matter a tinker's dam to anyone. It doesn't lower your cholesterol or supply any percentage of your MDR of veggies. It doesn't make you look five pounds thinner or update your wardrobe. It's not delicious with chocolate poured over it, and it doesn't make your mother-in-law less likely to interfere in your life. All the debate does is distract us from the real issue -- which is writing something well enough to attract readers and get them to write thoughtful or funny responses.
posted by
Pat_B
on
July 19, 2006
at
7:03 AM
| |
reply
I think everyone should write whatever they want, and likewise in their
reading. Also listening, eating, viewing, buying, whatever. I think if you are not hurting anyone, then so be it.
It's your thang, do whatcha wanna do, do. :)
posted by
Schatz
on
July 19, 2006
at
5:28 AM
| |
reply
shelly
Right on!!!
posted by
Offy
on
July 19, 2006
at
5:19 AM
| |
reply
ShellyB, If they fell that way, then just encourage them to read you and me
and truly the difference that will gladly see! God bless, have a good day!
posted by
MountainClimber57
on
July 19, 2006
at
5:14 AM
| |
reply
Copy (or write down) this comment's web address (URL), which is:
Next, go to the email or web page where you want to link to this comment, and paste
(or type) the web address.