Comments on ANTICHRIST

Go to THE BOOK OF REVELATIONAdd a commentGo to ANTICHRIST

XENO-X
All good points ... and well-said!

posted by GEPRUITT on June 6, 2006 at 7:12 PM | link to this | reply

Xeno-x - it's absurd on an even simpler plain than what is written
People in the year 2006 are looking at writings from so many centuries ago to fuel a completely irrational superstition. Like who even cares what it says or what is meant by the babblings of persons from the 3rd century? Some people in our current time need to join us in the 21st century and especially need to look at the history of people prophecising the arrival of the anti-christ throughout history. For example, 600ME was a bad year for these knuckleheads, as was the 6th year of every century and especially 1006ME. It's just a number with a vaguely outlined story attached to it. Typically it's meaning will be argued with a heightened intensity on or around dates that seem significant to what this story is saying. Inevitably, those who perform any action based on this nonsensical story, will just be added to the list of knuckleheads that have done the same throughout history.

posted by gomedome on June 3, 2006 at 2:09 PM | link to this | reply