Go to Should Bush Be Impeached?
- Add a comment
- Go to One of Our Finest Bloggers Seems to Think So. How About You?
Oh, and being called "one of the finest bloggers" by one of the finest
bloggers is very much appeciated. Thanks.
posted by
saul_relative
on May 29, 2005 at 5:58 PM
| link to this | reply
kingmi, the Republicans have learned well from their mistakes during
the Nixon years and are determined to never see it happen again. However, a new term has crept into vogue: permanent campaign. This is the constant eroding of political power of an elected official to make him look ineffectual, whether he is or not, giving creedence to claims that he may be and swaying votes accordingly. It was used most effectively, as you've pointed out, by the Gingrich camp with regard to Clinton. (Of course, good ole Bill didn't help himself much with his own public image.)
But let's hope you're wrong with this one. Beleive it or not, I'd rather have Cheney as president. Hell, he's just more presidential appearing than Dubya will ever be, despite the fact that he's considered too unapproachable and caustic.
Thanks for the reference, dude.
posted by
saul_relative
on May 29, 2005 at 5:57 PM
| link to this | reply
Ann, You are way too young to remember Watergate, so I have to give you lessons on history! Hahaha. Thanks for reading!
posted by
kingmi
on May 29, 2005 at 5:35 PM
| link to this | reply
Very interesting opinions. Like you mentioned, here we go round the mulberry bush.......
Ann.
posted by
A-and-B
on May 29, 2005 at 5:28 PM
| link to this | reply