Go to Religion is a Sham
- Add a comment
- Go to Sham Promises . . . .
BTW . . . .
You should have written "you're" rather than "your" in your comment. I wouldn't have normally brought that up, but, since you called me a loser, I thought I'd point out the irony.
After looking up "axiom" and "empirical," you might want to check out a basic grammar text shwowing the difference between various homonyms. (You may have to look up "homonyn" first!
posted by
archiew
on April 6, 2005 at 6:26 AM
| link to this | reply
So . . . .
You can't answer my question or respond rationally, so you stoop to name calling! Funny.
posted by
archiew
on April 6, 2005 at 6:18 AM
| link to this | reply
As I suspected...your simply a loser.
posted by
Entrepreneur_Maker
on April 6, 2005 at 6:15 AM
| link to this | reply
Ooops!
That should have been "answer"!
posted by
archiew
on April 6, 2005 at 6:04 AM
| link to this | reply
Question has been answered several times:
Are you stating your question correctly? Part of the charm of this site, blogging.com, is that writers can learn te express themselves better.
Or, do you just not like/understand my ansser.
Did you ever figure out what an axiom is? It is a basic science term that is relavent to this discussion.
posted by
archiew
on April 6, 2005 at 6:01 AM
| link to this | reply
Are you going to answer my questions or is this posting through?
posted by
Entrepreneur_Maker
on April 6, 2005 at 5:53 AM
| link to this | reply
PDA?
Not sure ehat that has to do with anything; are you saying you don't know what the word means. The implication you stated is not the only inference that can be derived from natural laws.
posted by
archiew
on April 6, 2005 at 5:51 AM
| link to this | reply
Yes but that doesn't stop them from being completely pointless.
posted by
chris2303
on April 6, 2005 at 5:09 AM
| link to this | reply
Yes -
Dell makes a PDA called by that name.
Are you going to answer my question or is this a fruitless discussion?
Let me up the ante, LAW by its nature implys a higher authority to govern it. I agree there is no 'mythical' or mystical creature...
I'll ask again - What is natural law based on ? Who governs it to see that it works? Please don't tell me mother nature...
posted by
Entrepreneur_Maker
on April 6, 2005 at 5:08 AM
| link to this | reply
Have you heard the term "Axiom"?
posted by
archiew
on April 6, 2005 at 5:05 AM
| link to this | reply
archiew: Kind of stating the obvious, aren't you?
posted by
chris2303
on April 6, 2005 at 4:58 AM
| link to this | reply
your not answering the question.
What you are describing is the parts that are effected by the natural law.
posted by
Entrepreneur_Maker
on April 6, 2005 at 4:53 AM
| link to this | reply
Natural law is based on
forces, structure, and whatever happens at subatomic levels. There is no mythical creature that set it up or runs it.
posted by
archiew
on April 6, 2005 at 4:52 AM
| link to this | reply
Tell me then..
and taking 'religion' out of the picture. I do believe 'religion' is a tool that has been used by man to control man. However to your point 'natural-law' will prevail...
what is natural law based on?
posted by
Entrepreneur_Maker
on April 6, 2005 at 4:50 AM
| link to this | reply