Go to Religion is a Sham
- Add a comment
- Go to A commenter suggested
I was not calling them bad . . . .
Bad is not a strong enough term; I remember calling them sham artists, roaches, criminals, charlatans, burt not bad. They go beyond bad.
And calling a charlatan "bad" is not calling oneself bad, not in the rational world I inhabit. It is a social necessity to help others see the evil fraud they perform.
posted by
archiew
on March 27, 2005 at 6:32 AM
| link to this | reply
Expose you?
I was merely responding to you. I was speaking of exposing the religious charlatans. Please re-read what I wrote. How could I attack/expose you? I don't know you!
Don't be so sensitive; don't feel you are so important. None of us are that important.
posted by
archiew
on March 27, 2005 at 6:30 AM
| link to this | reply
you can expose me if you wish
it's not important. what i wanted to iterate is that by attacking them, you call them bad. when you call another bad, you are calling yourself bad. projecting guilt onto another is to avoid dealing with it where it lies, within the mind that gives it away. that is all i meant. have a great day.
posted by
avant-garde
on March 27, 2005 at 6:10 AM
| link to this | reply