Comments on OH YES!!! NOW THAT YOU MENTION PAT BUCHANAN . . .

Go to "THIS MACHINE KILLS FASCISTS " - Add a commentGo to OH YES!!! NOW THAT YOU MENTION PAT BUCHANAN . . .

Clinton didn't
slander anyone's reputation as far as I know.
didn't pass false rumors to knock someone out of an election
didn't violate separation of powers and congressional powers
didn't "stretch" the constitution.
didn't undermine American institutions.

posted by Xeno-x on February 27, 2005 at 12:08 PM | link to this | reply

sarooster
I love it. Once more I get to use this great quote.

"For conservatives it is an impeachable offensive for a president to lie about an extra martial affair, but lying to the country to get a personal war started is business as usual.'

While I am sure Clinton is far, far from being innocent in always telling the truth, he did not lie to start a war that weakening the country. All in all it seems to be about the weakest thing conservatives do when the bring up the biggest joke in politics ever. Going after Clinton for that one thin is stupid. It was waste of time and tax payer's money just for Star's and other's egos in trying to take down a president. I am embarrassed that we made such a big deal over it. It really was none of our business what he did and should have been left to be dealt with as most families do between those personally involved. If you wish to find fault with Clinton, find real issues and not some stupid infidelity thing. I would not be surprised to learn that most presidents have had lovers and if ever asked they denied it.

Grow up.

posted by kooka_lives on February 26, 2005 at 5:28 PM | link to this | reply

Let's put Bill Clinton up there also. Oh, wait, he's not a
conservative so he must be OK. Remember, I did not have sex with that woman........! I wonder how many other lies he told. He's told plenty. His mouth moves plenty!!

posted by sarooster on February 26, 2005 at 3:45 PM | link to this | reply

Here Here, as they say across the pond....

posted by WindTapper on February 23, 2005 at 1:52 PM | link to this | reply