Comments on (No subject)

Go to not the house lifeAdd a commentGo to (No subject)

The spending fuels their vehicle of propaganda. More publicity from the event. There maybe the fallacy of the wrong idea that cheaper is not good enough.

Ann.

posted by A-and-B on January 21, 2005 at 2:08 PM | link to this | reply

the lobbyists want ot make sure the politicians they've bought
are reminded who bought them

posted by fwmystic on January 21, 2005 at 12:29 PM | link to this | reply

So true LoanLady, they spend money like it's ours.

posted by scriber on January 21, 2005 at 12:01 PM | link to this | reply

those are some pricey burps david1spirit

posted by the-loanlady on January 21, 2005 at 10:33 AM | link to this | reply

It's OK

I hear that we spent over a million dollars on cow burps affect on the atmosphere!

True story!

posted by David1Spirit on January 21, 2005 at 10:04 AM | link to this | reply

david1spirit  I am going to post a list of what we paid for.  For example, although she looked lovely we paid almost one hundred thousand dollars for three ball gowns and shoes for the First Lady.

posted by the-loanlady on January 21, 2005 at 10:01 AM | link to this | reply

thanks roofy!

posted by the-loanlady on January 21, 2005 at 9:59 AM | link to this | reply

Don't fret too much
It didn't matter who they would have sworn in; they still would have spent about the same!

posted by David1Spirit on January 21, 2005 at 9:55 AM | link to this | reply

Uh-oh, don't let the elephants read this, they've already attacked scoops for his posts.

But don't worry, I got your back.  ;-)

posted by roofpig on January 21, 2005 at 9:36 AM | link to this | reply