Comments on I am Old and Christianity is now packaged 'Lite'

Go to GRANDMA'S BELIEFSAdd a commentGo to I am Old and Christianity is now packaged 'Lite'

maj, which Michael were you referring to, Moore??!?!?

St. Michael Jordan, "Mikey, he likes it!", San Miguel de Allende,  or the one with all the angels, which?

Which one were they referring to when they began to use this expression, I wonder? You must know.

posted by benzinha on January 3, 2005 at 12:52 PM | link to this | reply

Not "Michael Smith" I hope.
Can't grok that...

posted by majroj on January 1, 2005 at 8:28 PM | link to this | reply

bb, smells and bells AND inclusion, how wonderful, what I need.

posted by benzinha on December 31, 2004 at 12:59 AM | link to this | reply

and, maj, I agree with all your ramblings herein...............

posted by benzinha on December 31, 2004 at 12:57 AM | link to this | reply

yes maj, spitirual and I love Mike, too.

posted by benzinha on December 31, 2004 at 12:56 AM | link to this | reply

"Spitirual"? Oh, for the love of Mike...

posted by majroj on December 30, 2004 at 9:48 PM | link to this | reply

Benzinha
This post was fascinating I found. There is of course lite and lite.
I don't attend church often. But a few months ago my children were christened at a church where the priest is an avid sponsor of the arts and had often enlisted my other half to make works and to teach children. So I guess we are part of the wider congregation of that church. It has a wonderfully inclusive atmosphere.
We so enjoyed that church when we went because it combined a kind and caring environment with high church - all the smells and bells.

posted by beachbelle on December 30, 2004 at 7:25 PM | link to this | reply

If you weren't cantankerous you'd be dead; so much for THAT!

Remember, I'm not religious or "spitirual". But I feel we are not "losing God" (I'm not quoting anyone consciously, just setting a concept up)with today's "lite" religion, but we are losing the culture and the complexity/texture of the historic religions. I think any religion easily gained but not easily lost is superstition, and when it is readily gained/lost, it is fairytales. When it is excruciatingly won and defended to the death, it is fanaticism. The zone where religion is a "good thing", in my humble opinion, is thin and sinuous and managed best by those raised and trained in it's richness and not its power.

I'm confused.

posted by majroj on December 30, 2004 at 4:36 PM | link to this | reply