Go to sarooster's opinion on things
- Add a comment
- Go to Thoughts on the "debate"
If He Couldn't Do Anything In 20 Years...
...why would people think that John Kerry could do something in 4 years?
It seems to me that he can't even make up his mind on what to do and when half the time.
Anyway, I listened with an open mind, but I can't find anything that would influence me to vote for him instead of re-electing Bush.
At least, he (Kerry) did give a good reason for supporting partial-birth abortion--that is, not totally banning it by law. Next time a bill is designed to ban it, there should be a clause in there that would protect doctors who abort late in the pregnancy to save the life of the mother. Hopefully, with that reassurance built into it, it would get passed.
Peace!
AJ 
posted by
Ainsley_Jo_Phillips
on October 12, 2004 at 3:45 AM
| link to this | reply
Don't know if I believe what you say!
I am pretty certain John Kerry would have mentioned China has asked us to have bi-lateral talks with North Korea if it were the case.
posted by
sarooster
on October 1, 2004 at 5:47 AM
| link to this | reply
China and North Korea
According to a news report I read this morning (Truth checker on the debate), China has actually asked us to have bilateral talks with North Korea.
It is obvious from your blog that you want to defend Bush... your tone shows a tinge of sadness. But you are not being objective, and your defenses are all making excuses for him.
If he is to be the leader of the Free World, I don't think we should be voting for him on the basis of pity.
posted by
sarwood
on October 1, 2004 at 5:02 AM
| link to this | reply