<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/BlogRss.aspx/bubush8695"><title>What's your take on this? - Blogit</title><link>http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/</link><description>Random thoughts and probing questions</description><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency><sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/616380" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/613508" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/610436" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/605274" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/602466" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/598233" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/594414" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/590748" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/587879" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/584377" /></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/616380"><title>They say a person must get a fair chance before he gets a severe punishment</title><link>http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/616380</link><description>I fully agree. But mustn't there be a balance between his fair chance and the trauma to the victim that comes from this process of "fair" chance? How does one give the victim a fair chance too and yet a long rope to the accused?</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/613508"><title>Not for me?</title><link>http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/613508</link><description>Not for me the special attention Not for me someone my own What can I do but gaze at the sky and stare? Not for me the wings of ecstasy Not for me the shores of happiness What am I but a broken soul that cannot soar or fly anymore?</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/610436"><title>When they want an insurance policy, they come running after you. But if</title><link>http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/610436</link><description>your policy lapses and u want help to revive it, no one is there. When they want to sell something they are after you. But when you want them for after-sales service, "today most of our staff have not shown up. Sorry we can't help you. It will take some time.". Do you all also feel like this. Or...</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/605274"><title>How would you view someone hopping political parties</title><link>http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/605274</link><description>and delivering the goods irrespective of what ideology the particular party professes?</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/602466"><title>Participatory planning? Does there have to be a box within which to plan?</title><link>http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/602466</link><description>If we are talking of bottom-up processes of planning, does it still become a top-down process of planning because our version of bottom-up process of planning is that the smallest political unit, i.e. a village or a city must have some directives from the top - state or country level within which...</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/598233"><title>When tears and heaviness combine</title><link>http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/598233</link><description>and anxiety and sleeplessness overtake, is that a psychiatric condition?</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/594414"><title>Can't a new trail be blazed in loving and living...</title><link>http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/594414</link><description>Can't a new trail be blazed in loving and living? Won't a new wave lash of giving and understanding? Can we explore love's depths and realms? since we have strength of conviction and no qualms?</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/590748"><title>Is it true that when men get physical, there is minimal emotional</title><link>http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/590748</link><description>involvement, whereas when women do, it is vice-versa? IF TRUE Is this biological? Is this social conditioning?</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/587879"><title>What is secularism really?</title><link>http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/587879</link><description>What is secular? is it the absence of religion? The recognition of diversity and the accomodation of all religious, pagan, agnostic and atheistic world-views? Or is it the progressive realisation of democratic ideals? What is secularism really?</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/584377"><title>All marriages are mixed marriages, so goes a quote quoted by EX_TURPI</title><link>http://www.blogit.com/Blogs/Blog.aspx/bubush8695/584377</link><description>It set me thinking what the author could have meant by that. I could reckon various interpretations. At one level, it seemed that what the author was saying is that invariably two people who get married do come from different backgrounds and hence it is a mixed marriage. It could also mean that...</description></item></rdf:RDF>